Re: Can't dig +trace?

2015-07-28 Thread Jaap Akkerhuis via Unbound-users
Fongaboo via Unbound-users writes: > > > I have unbound running and clients using dig seem not to be able to trace? > > > dig +trace www.amiga.com > > ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> +trace www.amiga.com > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Received 12 bytes from #53(MY-UNBOUND-IP) in 0 ms >

Re: Can't dig +trace?

2015-07-28 Thread Ispas Paul via Unbound-users
# control which clients are allowed to make (recursive) queries # to this server. Specify classless netblocks with /size and action. # By default everything is refused, except for localhost. # Choose deny (drop message), refuse (polite error reply), # allow (recursive ok), *al

Re: Can't dig +trace?

2015-07-28 Thread Anand Buddhdev via Unbound-users
On 28/07/15 15:17, Jaap Akkerhuis via Unbound-users wrote: > > However if I hit Google's lookup servers with the same command from the > > same client machine, I get the expected response... > > The +trace option causes dig not to use the local resolver. From the > dig manual: Not quite. If y

Re: Can't dig +trace?

2015-07-28 Thread Fongaboo via Unbound-users
Thanks for everyone's responses. An enlightening thread, and I fully understand now. FONG On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Anand Buddhdev via Unbound-users wrote: On 28/07/15 15:17, Jaap Akkerhuis via Unbound-users wrote: > However if I hit Google's lookup servers with the same command from the >