Re: press release

2000-07-30 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
Well HTML/XML can. PDF can if the app printing can (which I have verified when going from Word 2000 to PDF). I do not do much with PostScipt since I have never had a font need that was not met by TrueType michka - Original Message - From: "Maurice Bauhahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U

Re: press release

2000-07-30 Thread Maurice Bauhahn
Output goes to PDF, PostScript, line printers, PCL as well as HTML/XML. It would sure be nice if all those technologies handled context sensitive glyph placement...but this is only the year 2000. Cheers, Maurice Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote: > Perhaps I am confused but if they support Uni

Re: Euro

2000-07-30 Thread John Cowan
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, how WOULD you make a serifed, rounded E that > doesn't look silly and doesn't look like a C with > an extra line? Well, maybe you can, I dunno. Anyone > who can do that, I'd like to see it. http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/euro/euroglyph.

Re: press release

2000-07-30 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
Perhaps I am confused but if they support Unicode and the front end is a browser that supports Unicode (say Mozilla or IE 5.5) then why would Indic languages not be supported? Or are things converted from Unicode at some point during the process? michka - Original Message - From: "

Re: press release

2000-07-30 Thread Maurice Bauhahn
You may be interested to know that the reporting engine which PeopleSoft uses to render Unicode is available from my company. Brio Technology (http://www.brio.com) The product family which supports Unicode is Brio.Reports (including SQR Server, Brio.Report Builder, and Brio.Report Activator. P

press release

2000-07-30 Thread Mark Davis
BTW, saw the following press release from Peoplesoft PeopleSoft Implements Unicode link to http://checkers.peoplesoft.com/events.nsf/07dd07bae4e2a86b8825666700767bbf/f59d0dfabda3a051882569190047a690?OpenDocument

Re: Bangla(Bengali) letter Missing

2000-07-30 Thread Md Ziaur Rahman
> The guidlines for devanagari show these rules: > Ta virama = Ta virama (when final) > Ta virama ZWNJ = Ta virama > Ta virama [...] = conjunct form > Ta virama ZWJ = Devanagari half form of ta (= khando-ta?) I also shifted from standard by suggesting that Ta+virama = Khando-Ta(when final). Maxim

Re: Bangla(Bengali) letter Missing

2000-07-30 Thread Doug Ewell
Abdul Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If that is so, it only leaves the problem of how to display Unicode > encoded text, where the language is not known. Well, you could always use U+E0001 U+E0061 U+E0073 to mark your Assamese text and U+E0001 U+E0062 U+E006E to mark your Bengali text. Then