At 18:05 +0200 2000.08.23, James E. Agenbroad wrote:
>In a list of Devanagari conjuncts if compiled a while ago there are at
>least two cases of conjuncts in which both consonants have a nukta:
>1. Ka + nukta + halant + ka + nukta = qqa
>2. Ka + nukta + hanant + pha + nukta = qfa
>
>I think:
At 19:57 +0200 2000.08.23, Antoine Leca wrote:
>As a sidepoint (not really relevant, but it may matter), ISCII-91
>does use the combination of vowel with nukta, in both standalone
>and vowel sign form.
> short ri + nukta gives long rii
> short i + nukta gives short vocalic li (and issues a co
At 01:18 +0200 2000.08.23, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>I think the valid way to bracket this is:
>
>[{( Ka + Nukta ) + Virama} + {( Ta + Nukta ) + Virama} + Sa]
Is Ta+Nukta a valid/existing character?
[...]
>The only real question here is what typographical practice in Devanagari
>would be i
Good evening Eleven Digit Boy!
Profuse thanks for the sparkling new pedometer, which
arrived upon my black box by a very long and circuitous
route that took a good long time.
I regret to inform you that since I still do not walk,
the pedometer remains stuck at zero. Even upon the
occasion of th
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:
8-) In Mac OS 8.5, the definition of 0xDB in the MacRoman character set changed from
U+00A4 (currency sign) to U+20AC (Euro). Mac OS 8.5 and later treat 0xDB as the Euro.
8-)
8-) If you are omitting characters that don't translate, then perhaps you
On Saturday, August 19, 2000, at 08:50 AM, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote:
> I have a preliminary version of the fonts ready. It works, but there seems to be an
> issue with the conversion of the "currency" character and the character replacing
>it,
> in documents coming from Mac. All other character
James E. Agenbroad wrote:
>
> Whether a vowel or vowel sign can have a nukta I do not know.
As a sidepoint (not really relevant, but it may matter), ISCII-91
does use the combination of vowel with nukta, in both standalone
and vowel sign form.
short ri + nukta gives long rii
short i + nukta
Thanks. That code does need to be fixed, once we get the time.
Oliver Steinau wrote:
> I have a question concerning the CVTUTF.C file that is on the CD in the
> Unicode 3.0 book. There's a piece of code which I don't think is correct...
>
> Function ConvertUTF8toUTF16 contains the following piec
{snip}
> ] The only real question here is what typographical practice in Devanagari
> ] would be if two nuktated consonants came together in a halfform/fullform
> ] juxtaposition or in a conjunct form involving two nuktated consonants
> ] (do such conjunct forms even exist? -- I wo
http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvai
lableStandards.htm
TR 15285 is now there.
Ed
Edwin F. Hart
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
11100 Johns Hopkins Road
Laurel, MD 20723-6099
+1-443-778-6926 (Baltimore)
+1-240-228-6926 (DC Area
Hi,
The following are excerpts from the mapping tables contained on the Unicode
3.0 CD for CNS-11643 and BIG5. The mapping tables are 7 years old. However
since they are on the Unicode 3.0 CD I am assuming that they are still
valid...
CNS-11643
# WARNING! It is currently impossible to provide r
You can obtain copies of ISO standards from your national standards
organization. I do not know if the prices will be different.
In the US, it is ANSI
Attn: Customer Service
American National Standards Institute
1 W. 42nd St.
New York, NY 10026
1-212-642-4900
1-212-302-1286 (fax)
http://www.a
I have a question concerning the CVTUTF.C file that is on the CD in the
Unicode 3.0 book. There's a piece of code which I don't think is correct...
Function ConvertUTF8toUTF16 contains the following piece of code (line 210):
[ch is the result of the conversion so far]:
if (ch <=
13 matches
Mail list logo
