Asmus Freytag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you have a list of the Unicode 3.1 codes?
>
> They will appear in due course on ...draftunicode31
>
> You guys are all so eager!
Would you want it any other way? Of course, we are DYING to see the
new additions to Unicode -- especially those of us
Glyph rendering: Advantages and disadvantages of rendering
only withing the font Vs a mixture of within the font and within the O/S.
Can any one point me to information on the above.
(Note: Please look at
http://www.geocities.com/avarangal/tamilunicode.html
to see my question in detail.)
Reg
> There are a few things you should look at. One is the Linux FreeType
> project at
>
> http://www.freetype.org
A small correction: FreeType has *nothing* to do with Linux in
particular. It is written in ANSI C and supports all platforms. We
have users for Mac and Windows also.
> The F
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:15:05 -0800 (GMT-0800), Mark Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Here is my take on the way Unicode general categories should be
> mapped to POSIX ones.
Reiterated, here is my compilation of mapping of properties proposed
for Haskell:
isAssigned: all except Cs, Cn
isControl:
At 07:44 AM 10/20/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Asmus,
>
>Do you have a list of the Unicode 3.1 codes?
>
>Carl
They will appear in due course on ...draftunicode31
You guys are all so eager!
A./
PS: I've made some font fixes for the draftunicode32 charts - however they
don't affect any of the new cha
5 matches
Mail list logo
