On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 19:47:43 -0800, Krishna Desikachary wrote:
> a) There is an internationally accepted set of extra chars that are
> included in Roman (Latin) script to transacribe Sanskrit texts in
> Roman script. Does a Unicode standard exist for these characters?
> Were these ever standa
Guys,
Can we put this thread on a constructive footing? I am sure there is
lots of outdated and/or incorrect information out there and I would
like to preempt its being identified via numerous emails here.
If the belief is there
are misperceptions that need to be corrected, how should the
proble
Hello,
I have a two-fold question:
a) There is an internationally accepted set of
extra chars that are included in Roman (Latin) script to transacribe Sanskrit
texts in Roman script. Does a Unicode standard exist for these characters? Were
these ever standardises even outside the realm of
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 05:42:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A few days ago I said there was a "widespread belief" that Unicode is a
> 16-bit-only character set that ends at U+. A corollary is that the
> supplementary characters ranging from U+1 to U+10 are either
> little-
A few days ago I said there was a "widespread belief" that Unicode is a
16-bit-only character set that ends at U+. A corollary is that the
supplementary characters ranging from U+1 to U+10 are either
little-known or perceived to belong to ISO/IEC 10646 only, not to Unicode.
At lea
Mike,
Thanks for your response. I find myself disappointed that there isn't more
participation in this discussion (from others than you and I), but it will
undoubtedly come ;^)
At 05:05 PM 02/11/2001 + Sunday, J M Sykes wrote:
>I think you misunderstand me. The "maximum level" I was refer
Hi, I'm Beth Kaseman. I work with the Localization Institute. We are
putting together a Roundtable for people in Internationalization on 7-9
March 2001 near San Diego, CA. The Advisory Board includes Asmus Freytag,
Ken Lunde, Bill Hall, and others in the Unicode community. The agenda
includes Unic
Netscape currently (version 6.01) does not support bidi on any platform.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Rosenne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Hebrew (was RE: Unicode Transcri
IE for MAC does not include bidi.
Jony
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 3:46 PM
> To: Unicode List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Hebrew (was RE: Unicode Transcriptions)
>
>
>
> On 02/15/2001 10:49:00 AM RO
On 02/15/2001 10:49:00 AM ROBERT HODGSON wrote:
>I would very much appreciate being in touch with other colleagues who have
>had experience in displaying Hebrew characters with Unicode. Of interest
to
>us would be experiences in
>1) browser selection
>2) operating systems selection
The
On 02/15/2001 01:43:40 PM Pam Lothspeich wrote:
>I am a new user of unicode for devanagari (Hindi) in Microsoft Word. I am
>very impressed with this font, but I'm wondering if there is a way to
remap
>the keyboard, so that I don't have to use shortcut keys which require
>multiple keystrokes in
I wrote:
> Can you anticipate what these new BMP characters will be?
> Entire scripts or just additions to existing scripts?
Joel Rees replied:
> Hmm.
> Deseret is a script, isn't it? (although not necessarily of very broad
> application.)
> And I would say the 42,710 points for additional Han
George Zeigler wrote:
> my company is creating sites in multiple languages with pages being
created
> dynamically. The words are pulled into the pages from a MySQL database.
The
> programs are written in Perl. Our programmers cannot figure out how to
get
> Arabic and Hebrew working (right ->
Hi!
I just signed up today after receiving a note from a fellow macperler that
3.1 (extension B) included 40,000+ new Kanji. I checked unicode.org and
noted that 3.1 was in beta at last update, but that the conference period
for errata had ended.
(http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/ver
Carl W. Brown wrote:
>
> I think that it is an issue since Greece is on of the
> 12 countries that is switching to the Euro in less than 10 months.
This is not really on-topic here, but Greece switched to the Euro
a month and half _ago_ (on January 1st, 2001).
What will happen in 10 months 1/2
Hi William,
Many thanks for your valuable help.
William W.L.K wrote:
>
>> 1) for the "au" dependent vowel, I believe (extrapolating from the one for "o")
>> the correct encoding is U+1031 U+102C U+1039. However the use of the virama
>> inside of a "matra" part looks surprising to me (and it cre
Dear George
I know this is not what you asked, but if all else fails
and you can find no other solution, I have found that it is
quite easy to get Arabic and Hebrew letters to display in
the correct fashion using the JAVA programming language. If
the worst came to the worst, you could always u
Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> No. Unicode 3.1 has already been approved, and is in the
> last stages of publication. After that, Unicode 3.2 will
> appear, adding over 1000 more characters to the BMP.
Can you anticipate what these new BMP characters will be? Entire scripts or
just additions to existi
18 matches
Mail list logo
