Adarsh
Do you mean the physical keyboard (hardware) or the keyboard driver (software)???
Physical keyboards are pretty much the same whatever the script of the glyphs printed
on the keys. Its the software that interprets the key presses and sends characters on
that matters.
- Chris
--
Chris
From: "James Kass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, can Internet Explorer now display non-BMP characters ?!
> Still not having any luck on Windows M.E. with Marco Cimarosti's java
> charts. Any suggestions?
Thus far, I can make it work on Windows 2000 and Windows XP (with IE5.0,
5.5, and 6.0) but on
Michael Kaplan wrote:
> From: "John H. Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > >Has the UNIHAN.TXT file been updated to include radical-stroke data
> > >for Plane Two characters?
>
> > Yes. Ever since Unicode 3.1 was released. (We still don't have an
> > Extension B font, however.)
>
(Thank you
Dear Professor Dr. Genenz,
This should be Hancom Office, a program still known under its former
designation HWP.
Cf. www.haansoft.com/english. - Perhaps, the Korean language department
at Bonn University might know about the program.
Mit einem freundlichen gruss
Joerg Plassen
Genenz wr
Keyboard drivers under Windows 2000 input characters as
Unicode. Since Windows 2000 is Unicode-based, all Windows
2000 applications should have no problem in handling such
Unicode input.
Older platforms are a bit different. Seem to recall seeing
a few different "work-arounds". One method is to
Stephen,
Only the 7 bit ASCII characters are the same. UTF-8 encodes characters so
that you can tell how many bytes the character will take from the value of
the first byte of the character.
0x00 - 0x7F = 1 byte
0xC0 - 0xDF = 2 bytes
0xE0 - 0xEF = 3 bytes
0xF0 - 0xF7 = 4 bytes
0x80 - 0xBF is u
At 11:52 01/07/10 +0100, Stephen Cowe - Sun Scotland wrote:
>Hi Unicoders,
>
>I am new to the list and would be really grateful if you could help me out
>here.
>
>I am trying to discover if the "extended latin" 8-bit ascii (decimal
>values 128-255, Hex A0-FF), i.e. ISO-8859-1 are supported by UTF
Hi Stephen,
The short answer to your question is "no". The characters between U+0080 and
U+00FF *are* supported by UTF-8 (all Unicode characters are supported by
UTF-8), but they do not use the same code points as Latin-1. If they used
the same code points as Latin-1, they would *be* Latin-1 and
Please forgive me if off-topic in this list:
In order to make use of our university's LAN net
I have installed win2000 on all PCs in our institute
and then, to enable all users to read and write texts
in their native (oriental) languages (from Arabic to Japanese)
I have provided them with MS Off
If you mean under Windows, then the answer is that they return Unicode in
Unicode applications. Perhaps more details on the platform you are using?
MichKa
Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Adarsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
Hi,
I would like to know whether the keyboards for hindi and arabic etc
sends input in the form of unicode or Ascii. If unicode how to capture that
input in programs.Are the keyboards easily available in market.
Thanks & regards
Adarsh.
Hi Unicoders,
I am new to the list and would be really grateful if you could help me out here.
I am trying to discover if the "extended latin" 8-bit ascii (decimal
values 128-255, Hex A0-FF), i.e. ISO-8859-1 are supported by UTF-8, and
if so, are the values the same.
The reason why I am asking
At 03:01 PM 2001-07-09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Odd. I've always considered Japanese "double consonants" to be
> > glottal stops. Could anyone please explain the difference?
>
>They are glottal stops.
No. "yappari" contains a syllabic voiceless bilabial stop, and similarly
'tt' is a
Michael (akerbeltz.alba)
> Hawai'ian uses the macron actually ... but there are numerous
> languages which don't use diacritics ... Siksika, Miccosukee,
> Sardinian, Dutch, Pawnee, Rotokas the list is long, with
> many small languages on it, [...]
Dutch uses the acute accent for emphasis (o
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In the Arabic block, there are four characters with compatibility
> > decompositions: 0675 - 0678. The names list says that these are for
Kazakh.
> > I'm wondering why these have compatibility decompositions and not
canonical
> > deompositions (p
15 matches
Mail list logo
