> After considerable and unfortunate delay, the new Ethnologue site,
> including the online version of the 14th Edition, is at last
> available to
> the public: http://www.ethnologue.com/home.asp. There are
> still refinements
> being made, but all the basics are there and working.
Very nice! S
Some have the .lnk and others a .bat
Carl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of $B$F$s$I$&$j$e$&$8(B
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 2:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT: some kind of virus?
>
>
> 'Tis a Trojan, I think.
>
>
After considerable and unfortunate delay, the new Ethnologue site,
including the online version of the 14th Edition, is at last available to
the public: http://www.ethnologue.com/home.asp. There are still refinements
being made, but all the basics are there and working.
- Peter
---
'Tis a Trojan, I think.
Is it a .lnk extension?
In my other e-mail (the spamtrap one) I got a 640K mail. It seemed like a Trojan.
$B"!$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s"!(B
?$B!V0&!W$O!V$"$$!W$G$9!#!V(B10^-10$B!W$b!V$"$$!W$G$9!#!h!V0&!W$O!V(B10^-10$B!W$G$9!#(B
?$B;d$O$m$3$($s$i$+$Y$5$G$9!#(B
?$B"v%i!
Besides several mails containing an attachment with this W32.Sircam.Worm@mm I've been
getting an extraordinary number of mails with an attachment containing the
TROJ_SIRCAM.A virus during the past 24 hours.
- Chris
Everyone,
*My* system is not infected. I use a Macintosh, and can't remember if
the last time I saw a virus on it was in 1989 or 1990. (Michael feels
delicious glee.)
I'm just the victim of the poor sods whose mailers are taken by it
and sending to me. Why they are sending to me is a mystery.
At 15:39 2001-07-24 +0100, Michael Everson wrote:
>I KNOW this isn't the forum for this, but for the last three days
It's the W32/SirCam@MM virus. It is the nastiest virus yet,
just look at the sheer number of infected systems that keep
trying to spread it. It is extremely annoying even if you a
Jungshik Shin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I put up a screenshot of glyphs for GooGyeol
> characters included in one of fonts mentioned above at
>http://jshin.net/~jungshik/i18n/googyeol.png
Looks to me like everything, or nearly everything, in that list is just a
brush-style rendering of
If you had run teh attachment you are in deep trouble. See here for removal,
complicated but easy fix not available yet.
SIRCAM worm. Please take action immdtly.
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also pass on the information to all people from whom you have got mails.
Thanks & Regards
Arijit Upadhyay
Hi,
This is a notice to inform that for the upcoming release version 2.0, ICU4C
will be adding internationalized string search.
Internationalized string search produces different results depending on the
locale. It is coordinated with collation, and must handle some interesting
edge cases. To s
I have gotten roughly 100 of them, from various email addresses on my web
site.
michka
- Original Message -
From: "Carl W. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: some kind of virus?
> M
The cause of the virus is a web crawler. I suspect that they are pulling
them off of the yahoo archive site.
michka
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:39 AM
Subject: OT: some kind of virus?
> I KNOW th
Marc,
I see to many people define LCIDs in hex. It is a very bad practice. Use
winnt.h to produce the codes. You are not only prone to fewer errors but
when things change you will get compile errors.
For example:
LANGSUBLANGINT(LANG_RUSSIAN,SUBLANG_DEFAULT), "ru_RU" ,
LANGSUBLANGINT(LAN
Michael,
I have gotten three of them. One from Sriharsha Sankarrao and two from
deportes. Two in English and one in Spanish. Fortunately I did not open
the attachment.
Form the ICU list:
Some people on the ICU mailing list have been getting the
W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus, like myself. The nor
Michael:
>> 3. What is the official source for LCIDs? I have found at least 10
tables
>of LCIDs, *all different* in the languages they list on Microsoft's site.
>Microsoft should have just one table of LCIDs published on their website,
>not one for each technology.
>
>I would say where to look
I KNOW this isn't the forum for this, but for the last three days
I've been getting mail from all sorts of people I never heard of,
which contains some 170K attachment, and the following text:
Hi! How are you?
I send you this file in order to have your advice
See you later. Thanks.
And sometim
On 07/23/2001 09:33:50 PM Marc Durdin wrote:
>In the MSDN library, at least in Nadine Kano's book "Developing
International
>Software for Windows 95 and Windows NT", which is included on the CD, the
>language Lao (or Laotian) is listed with LCID 0x42B. This LCID was set to
>Armenian in Windows
Thanks a lot for your kind and detailed answer. I'm very glad
that Microsoft set an example of Old Hangul support with dynamic glyph
composition (as opposed to pre-composed glyphs) and made it clear that
Hangul should be treated as a complex script along with Indic/Thai/Lao
scripts to be full
18 matches
Mail list logo
