In a message dated 2001-11-01 12:23:58 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > But won't this approach fail as soon as we hit a 0x00 byte (i.e. the
> > high 8 bits of any Latin-1 character)?
>
> I'm not sure what you're alluding to here. As long as
> all characters in wstr be
In a message dated 2001-10-31 15:54:34 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Has any one done worst case scenarios on SCSU, with respect to other
> methods of encoding Unicode characters?
In addition to theoretical worst-case scenarios, it might also be worthwhile
to consider th
Thursday, November 1, 2001
The following quotation from "Computer graphics in India: an architecture
for shaping Indic texts, by S.P.Mudur, Niranjan Nayak, Shrinath Shanbhag,
R.K.Soshj" [or Joshi?] (Computers & grpahics 23 (1999) may be helpful:
3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2001-10-31 10:07:44 Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> This is wrong. wchar_t strings can of course be printed. Reading the
>> ISO C standard would tell you to use
>>
>> printf ("%ls", wstr);
>>
>> can be used to print wchar_t
> The correct site for the Shusha font for Devnagari is
> http://www.bharatbhasha.com/
And by the way, that site wants Visual Basic Scripting support, so you
can't view it in Netscape at all...
Rick
Please also look at the Indic FAQ page http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/.
Other FAQ pages may also be helpful.
Note that the Unicode Standard is online on the Unicode site, so if you
don't have a copy you can read it there.
Mark
—
Δός μοι ποῦ στῶ, καὶ κινῶ τὴν γῆν —
Ἀρχιμήδης
[http://www
At 20:41 +0100 2001-10-31, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>* Michael Everson
>|
>| His name was Spurius Carvilius Ruga.
>
>Bright and Daniels gives his name as "Spurius Carvilius Rufa".
Sampson gives Ruga. And so do 28 documents searched in Google. Google
gives none with Rufa (for what it's worth).
hey
what's the hell it is connecting to some pron site..
-Original Message-From: Arjun Aggarwal
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001
1:53 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: No proper
representation of Devnagari in Unicode
Hi Everybody
The Unic
At 00:22 11/1/2001, Arjun Aggarwal wrote:
>The Unicode character set in it's current form does not support Devnagari
>well.It has no half characters for the Devnagari script.
>It is just like not having e a d f in the roman(latin) script.
>
>This particular aspect renders it useless to be used b
Title: Message
Smooth
"fonts" on the web-site :-)
Maybe
one should check links before sending them public.
BR
Audun
H. Lona
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Arjun AggarwalSent: 1. november 2001 09:23To:
[EMAIL PR
Hi Everybody
The correct site for the Shusha font for Devnagari
is http://www.bharatbhasha.com/
and not the earlier one that i mentioned. I don't
know why the person owning that domain name earlier made it out into a
pornographic site.
I am sorry for not checking out the URL in
advance.
Hi Everybody
The Unicode character set in it's current form does
not support Devnagari well.It has no half characters for the Devnagari
script.
It is just like not having e a d f in the
roman(latin) script.
This particular aspect renders it useless to be
used by anyone including pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
