Hi,
I joined in a bit late on this.
On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 Gaspar Sinai wrote :
>I think that the Indian sctipts deserve better character
>assignement -
The character assignment of Indian scripts is already quite well done. Since
it follows the ISCII88 standard, though, some ambiguities may rem
Howdy there...
I've been following this thread about the deficiencies of Unicode, and its
pretty much a hoot and a holler. If anyone can devise a better solution,
please feel free to stage a coup d'etat and overthrow the hegemony of
Unicode. I'm sure it could be done better: in an ideal world
Dhrubajyoti Banerjee wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 Gaspar Sinai wrote :
> >I think that the Indian sctipts deserve better character
> >assignement -
[...]
> However the idea you present, of pushing half characters,
> does not sound correct.
Actually, Gaspar's idea of encoding half letters (and fo
One gotcha, that I run into every six months or so, is forgetting that
the punctuation characters in the Basic Latin block are classified as
Latin script. This trips me up because most of my text processing work
involves CJK, so I'll write something to filter latin characters with
(in Rosette nota
4 matches
Mail list logo