Re: Devanagari on MacOS 9.2 and IE 5.1

It should be fine also on Netscape 6.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> I spoke to fast. Upon taking a closer look at the file, the font was not set properly. MacOS 9.2, Indian Language Kit, Mac IE 5.1 and Devanagari MT as font face seem to display UTF-8 encoded Hindi just fine.E

Re: Unicode 3.2 Beta Period Finishing

Currently, the Coptic characters are treated as extensions to the Greek script, much as the Urdu characters are treated as extensions to the Arabic script. So for now, at least, they should be marked as Greek. If the UTC and SC2 ever disunify the scripts, then the Script property value would need

Re: Unicode 3.2 Beta Period Finishing

Doug Ewell reported: > Many of the embedded images in the Standardized Variants > document are missing. The missing images have been fixed. Rick

Re: RE: ü

Marco Cimarosti wrote: 27E7FB58F42CD5119C0D0002557C0CCA16B44F@XCHANGE"> Patrick Andries wrote: Funny: I have just read a similar but opposite opinion on an Italiannewsgroup. Somebody said: if really we must accept English terms such as"file" or "window", we should at list do the effort of

RE: Devanagari

David Starner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:20:17PM +0100, Marco Cimarosti wrote: > > What this means in practice for website developers is: > > > > 1) SCSU text can only be edited with a text editor which > properly decodes > > the *whole* file on load and re-encodes it on save. On the >

Re: Norwegian sorting

On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:11:43AM -0500, Tex Texin wrote: > Thanks Keld, that was one of the sources I checked first. > > I saw that it was based on a Norwegian standard, but it didn't say what > the standard was used for. So I didn't know if this was a collation that > dictionaries or phone boo

RE: ü

Patrick Andries wrote: > [...] I do firmly believe that foreign > loan-words taken with their original spelling (geüpdatet in Dutch or > week-end in French) upset the native spelling rules. I am not against > loan-words if they are useful (used and well-accepted), but I am for > their blending

RE: The benefit of a symbol for 2 pi

On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Murray Sargent wrote: >Capital pi is to product as capital sigma is to summation. But if I'm not mistaken, Unicode already has a separate character for n-ary products and summation (U+220F, U+2211), distinct from the capital Greek letters *and* the variant forms in the mathe

Re: ü

Michael Everson wrote: > > Languages don't mess with languages. People mess with languages. Useful reminder, but obviously it is an image just as much as when we say French has enriched or polluted English. >>> It isn't as if French hasn't been polluting English for a thousand >>> years or an

Devanagari on MacOS 9.2 and IE 5.1

I spoke to fast. Upon taking a closer look at the file, the font was not set properly. MacOS 9.2, Indian Language Kit, Mac IE 5.1 and Devanagari MT as font face seem to display UTF-8 encoded Hindi just fine. Etienne >Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:24:16 -0800 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Unicode 3.2 Beta Period Finishing

>Regarding > >Scripts-3.2.0d7.txt > >21-Jan-2002 13:5739k It says: 03D0..03F5; GREEK # L& [38] GREEK BETA SYMBOL..GREEK LUNATE EPSILON SYMBOL In the first place, 03E2 through 03EF are COPTIC letters, not Greek. In the

Re: Norwegian sorting

On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:14:55PM +0100, Stefan Persson wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Lars Marius Garshol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Unicoders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: den 21 januari 2002 15:16 > Subject: Re: Norwegian sorting > > > > I doubt that there is an official stan

Re: ü

At 20:09 -0500 2002-01-21, Patrick Andries wrote: >Kenneth Whistler wrote: > >>>Patrick Andries wrote: >>> >> >>>I must say that I have already seen horrors such as "geüpdated" (the "u" >>>is presumably approximated), again English messing with languages >>>spelling and pronounciation... Language

Re: Standardized Variants complete

At 18:18 -0800 2002-01-21, Rick McGowan wrote: >Yeah, I contemplated that sort of subdivision, which Asmus also suggested, >and it seems pretty gnarly to do, especially as every row in the Mongolian >table is different. Do you know a simple way to do those 4 or 6-cell >tables within tables? Yes