- Original Message -
From: "Audun H. Lona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Trond Trosterud "
<[EMAIL PROTECT
At 20:33 -0800 2002-02-16, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>Whether or not they would get support to be encoded is almost
>irrelevant as long as no-one comes forward and makes a formal
>proposal with solid background information. Only then can this issue
>be settled where it matters: in the UTC.
And WG2.
> -Opprinnelig melding-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] På vegne av Stefan Persson
> Sendt: 17. februar 2002 11:32
> Til: Audun H. Lona; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
At 12:47 + 2002-02-17, John Clews wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Audun H. Lona" writes:
>
>> The term "saami" should be replaced with "sami" as in the 639 original
>> document (i hope).
>
>Actually, that's not the case.
>
>1. All the Saami language councils have preferred to use
Curtis Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:30 PM 2/14/02, David Starner wrote:
> >One out of two ain't bad, I guess. That was garbage on the screens of
> >some of the subscribers, though - UTF-8 display is still not
universal.
You have a UTF-8 sig block, right, David? :-)
With my recent c
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:23:20PM -0800, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Curtis Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At 08:30 PM 2/14/02, David Starner wrote:
> > >One out of two ain't bad, I guess. That was garbage on the screens of
> > >some of the subscribers, though - UTF-8 display is still not
> univ
6 matches
Mail list logo