Mark Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps what is meant by the original request would be satisfied by
> the property:
>
> Default_Ignorable_Code_Point
>
> defined in
>
http://www.unicode.org/Public/3.2-Update/DerivedCoreProperties-3.2.0.txt
>
> These are essentially characters that have no
Just a very small correction:
At 07:19 02/04/22 -0400, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
>There are other ways as well. Apache will already (if you use the
>default configs) add the Content-Language header if you use a filename
>like foo.en.html. You could have it also add the charset via a
>similar m
At 22:25 02/04/19 +0100, Steffen Kamp wrote:
>However, when giving the validator a ASCII-only document with a META tag
>specifying UTF-16 as encoding (just for testing) it says that it does not
>yet support this encoding, so I don't fully trust the validator in this case.
The validator indeed doe
There is a new version of UTR #18 that rolls in the latest changes
from the UTC plus updates for Unicode 3.2. See
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/
Mark
You say:
> Lemme see, that's 0x4B 0x00 0x65 0x00 0x6E 0x00.
>
> There's no BOM, and no external tagging as "UTF-16LE," and since
this is
> the Internet, we don't know the endianness of the originating
machine.
>
> So, based on last week's discussion between Ken, Mark Davis, and me,
I
> am *requir
> | I am surprised by the "must only be used". It seems I am not
> | conforming by including a meta statement in the utf-16 HTML page. I
> | should either remove the statement or encode the HTML up to and
> | including that statement as ascii. I'll check on this.
>
> It doesn't make much sense to
One of the Dublin papers talks about how this is done in ICU:
http://www.unicode.org/iuc/iuc21/a347.html
Mark
—
Γνῶθι σαυτόν — Θαλῆς
[For transliteration, see http://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/tr]
http://www.macchiato.com
- Original Message -
From: "Geoffrey Waigh" <[EMAIL PR
Perhaps what is meant by the original request would be satisfied by
the property:
Default_Ignorable_Code_Point
defined in
http://www.unicode.org/Public/3.2-Update/DerivedCoreProperties-3.2.0.t
xt
These are essentially characters that have no visible glyphs and no
advance width, but may have a d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> FYI: http://linguistlist.org/issues/13/13-1106.html#3
And I thought the Unicode bomber was %u9090%u6858%ucbd3... guy!
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:34:47PM -0700, Curtis Clark wrote:
> Somehow I got on a Korean spam list a while back, and I get between 10 and
> 20 emails a day in euc-kr. The majority have subject lines that start with
> U+AD11 U+ACE0. If it's not obscene, could someone tell me what that means?
I
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Zsigri Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How many printable characters are there in Unicode 3.2.0? I tried
> > desperately to find the answer at the Unicode web site but could
> > not.
>
> There are 95,156 total assigned characters.
>
> To find the
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Plus there is a disdain for corporate interest (or there has
> been in many
> past postings) since they want something independent?
The group does not disdain corporate interest, although some individu
Somehow I got on a Korean spam list a while back, and I get between 10 and
20 emails a day in euc-kr. The majority have subject lines that start with
U+AD11 U+ACE0. If it's not obscene, could someone tell me what that means?
(Thanks to SC Unipad, I can see the Hangul, although I don't read Kore
13 matches
Mail list logo
