Kenneth Whistler wrote as follows.
In practice, fonts might simply choose to have ligatures for
the entire sequence, to avoid complications of calculating
the accent positions dynamically.
For more examples, just look in dictionary pronunciation guides.
--Ken
An interesting problem which may
At 10:33 +0100 2002-08-31, William Overington wrote:
An interesting problem which may arise is that the Unicode Consortium will
not be specifying particular ligatures to include in fonts
That isn't its job.
You're right that guidance to what precomposed glyphs are useful is
necessary. But it
Edward H Trager wrote as follows.
... I was also thinking
about the issue of how do you get the highly qualified designers
interested in such a project?
In answer to the specific question.
One might consider the possibility of offering them a fee-paid assessment of
a portfolio of their work
Curtis Clark jcclark at mockfont dot net wrote:
Until I converted Jarkko's text, I wondered if he wasn't trying to
make a Unicode form of rot13, so that readers could choose not to be
offended. Torsten, when will Unipad support converting the U+
format?
U+ is the standard way to
Peter_Constable at sil dot org wrote:
Something that wouldn't be difficult would be an item that copied data
to the clipboard, and then displayed character info based on the
clipboard content.
Hmm, an interesting thought. I would be willing to write a mini-tool
like this, if enough people
5 matches
Mail list logo
