RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-02 Thread Jony Rosenne
I would like to summarize my understanding: 1. The sequence Lamed Patah Hiriq is invalid for Hebrew. It is invalid in Hebrew to have two vowels for one letter. It may or may not be a valid Unicode sequence, but there are many examples of valid Unicode sequences that are invalid. 2. How the GUI

RE: Accented ij ligatures (was: Unicode Public Review Issues update)

2003-07-02 Thread Kent Karlsson
Believe it or not, the IJ and ij digraphs *were* included for compatibility with an 8-bit legacy character set (ISO 6937). 6937 is a multibyte encoding (one or two bytes per character). There are no combining characters at all in 6937, even though there is a common misunderstanding that there

RE: Accented ij ligatures (was: Unicode Public Review Issues update)

2003-07-02 Thread Kent Karlsson
In either cases, the Soft_Dotted property is probably overkill on the existing ij or IJ ligatures (should should have been better There is no point in having a soft-dotted property for the capital letter... named letters and not ligatures) for Dutch. Or is this update needed to document

Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-02 Thread Philippe Verdy
On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:55 PM, Jony Rosenne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to summarize my understanding: 1. The sequence Lamed Patah Hiriq is invalid for Hebrew. It is invalid in Hebrew to have two vowels for one letter. It may or may not be a valid Unicode sequence, but

Re: Biblical Hebrew (U+034F Combining Grapheme Joiner works)

2003-07-02 Thread Owen Taylor
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 01:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Verdy wrote on 06/28/2003 02:48:01 AM: If the user strikes the two keys patah and hiriq, the input method for Traditional Hebrew will generate patah,CGJ,hiriq That requires* an input method that is aware of the input context

RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

2003-07-02 Thread Jony Rosenne
I cannot agree with some of these statements. My comments are inserted. Jony -Original Message- From: Philippe Verdy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:43 PM To: Jony Rosenne Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew On

Re: Accented ij ligatures (was: Unicode Public Review Issues update)

2003-07-02 Thread Doug Ewell
Kent Karlsson kentk at cs dot chalmers dot se wrote: Believe it or not, the IJ and ij digraphs *were* included for compatibility with an 8-bit legacy character set (ISO 6937). 6937 is a multibyte encoding (one or two bytes per character). There are no combining characters at all in 6937,

Re: Biblical Hebrew (U+034F Combining Grapheme Joiner works)

2003-07-02 Thread Peter_Constable
[Inadvertently sent just to me; forwarded with Philippe's permission] On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Verdy wrote on 06/28/2003 02:48:01 AM: If the user strikes the two keys patah and hiriq, the input method for Traditional Hebrew