Hello,
Thank you all for your answers to my questions on the above topic. They will give me
the lead to begin working on my little project. I will get back to you if I get stuck
along the way.
kyekyeku
-Original Message-
From: ext Peter Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, Au
At 18:03 -0400 2003-08-07, Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote:
My knowledge of Aramaic script is a little scanty, but my understanding is
more or less the same as Peter's. Which leads me
to suggest that encoding Aramaic separately
would be a bit like encoding Old Akkadian
(Cuneiform) separately from Neo
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 3:53 PM, Peter Kirk wrote:
This answer presupposes that there is a well-defined concept of which
base character a combining mark belongs to. That is not always true.
The particukar combining mark which precipitated the debate may be
situated above the gap between
> > <>
> >
> > Spams de Philippe Verdy non tolérés: tout message non sollicité sera
> > rapporté à son fournisseur de services Internet.
>
> There was no spam in the message you deleted. This was a
> single post to the list, no cross-posting, no advertizing, no
> product sold, no money cla
> From: "Jon Hanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Some of these only apply to elements that do not allow any
> > character data apart from whitespace to appear directly within them, and
> > hence are not an issue here. Some happen at relatively high level of
> > processing, e.g. rendering (not parsing) o
...
> > (them being canonically equivalent)? An invisible combining
> character
> > does not interfere typographically with anything, it being
> invisible!
>
> The same thing can be said about any inserted invisible character,
> combining or not.
>
> How is: supposed to be different from
>
On 05/08/2003 17:13, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Peter Kirk said:
From what Ken says, it sounds like it will be wrong from whenever
Unicode 4.0 is officially issued
Actually Unicode 4.0 was officially issued on April 17, 2003.
What we are waiting on now is for the publication of the text
o
7 matches
Mail list logo