I don't know.
I do know of course what
http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=24650 tells about
it.
But just maybe there is more?
"The worst thing about censorship is "
Right now I don't know if the relevant item is 24560 or 24650 or both.
- Original Message -
Fro
Would anyone know what U+24650 means?
Many thanks
Patrick Andries
On 2003年10月10日, at 下午2:48, Magda Danish (Unicode) wrote:
My problem is to recognize from the 32 bit value of unicode
character if this
is a chinese character or korean or japanese. How can do this?
It's basically impossible and largely meaningless. It's the equivalent
of asking if "a" is an Engl
The English TXJ names come from Michael Nylan's book. You'll have to
find that book to learn what she meant. Or better, get a copy of the
Chinese original. -Richard
On Saturday, Oct 11, 2003, at 13:28 US/Pacific, Patrick Andries wrote:
Would anyone know where I could find some background in
Okay, I found what I was looking for,
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2416.pdf has the Chinese names.
P. A.
Would anyone know where I could find some background information on the
Tai Xuan Symbols (U+1D300-U+1D356)? Any JTC1/SC2 document? The Chinese
names?
I'm having problem understanding a lot of names in this block. For
instance :
What does "watch" mean in U+1D344? Timepiece? Peri
> Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Report Type: Other Question, Problem, or Feedback
>
> My problem is to recognize from the 32 bit value of unicode
> character if this is a chinese character or korean or japanese.
How can do this?
You can tell if it is NOT from a legacy character set
On Friday 2003.10.10 14:48:58 -0700, Magda Danish (Unicode) wrote:
> Roberto,
>
> I am forwarding your question to the Unicode mailing list for possible
> answers from the list's subscribers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Magda Danish
> Administrative Director
> The Unicode Consortium
> 650-693-3921
>
>
>
I've added a DEC MCS table to the character tables at:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/csettables.html
- Frank
On 11/10/2003 05:37, Gautam Sengupta wrote:
...
[Gautam]: I did hedge my claim by saying that I was
going to cite a rather minor example. But why would I
want to do this extra bit of computing - however
trivial - when I could have avoided it by adopting a
more "appropriate" encoding in the first
--- Peter Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/10/2003 21:22, Gautam Sengupta wrote:
>
> > ...
> >
> > Yes, but not just programmers who are concerned
> with how a Unicode
> > text should be encoded, but also those who are
> going to have to
> > process these texts for various purposes. Let
--- Marco Cimarosti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hallo, Mr. Sengupta.
>
> > Now let's consider the same pair of inputs in *my*
> > representation. They would be K+R+VIRAMA+I and
> > J+VIRAMA+AA+I. All that the morphological analyzer
> would
> > have to do is chop off the rightmost . The
> leftover
12 matches
Mail list logo
