I propose nothing. I don't even mention the possibility of anything to
make a full phonetic representation, merely something which could be
used, by those who want to mark up text in that way (although many will
choose not to), to distinguish between words with the same spelling but
different
Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
But the good screen reader would still need to distinguish their
pronunciations. Is there any type of character which could be defined,
in Unicode, to preserve this distinction, but to be completely hidden in
display? Perhaps some kind of zero width
Am Sonntag, 4. April 2004 12:39 schrieb Chris Jacobs:
By the way, am I correct in assuming that a Wachstube is a big
transparant perspex tube used as a greenhouse?
Wachs|tube:
collapsible tube containing wax
Wach|stube:
guard parlour or a tiny police station with a single room
- Original Message -
From: Ernest Cline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Unicode Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: Fixed Width Spaces
[Original Message]
From: Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is
Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Uh, no. ZWNBSP, SPACE, ZWNBSP is equivalent to NBSP.
I suspect that equivalent is only for some aspects.
In particular, NBSP has a bidi category of CS, which means that A
0NBSP7 B (in bidi notation) displays as B 0 7 A, while A 0ZWNBSP,
SPACE, ZWNBSP7 B displays as
Dan Smith said on Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:04:22PM -0500,:
1) The documentation we've found for Unicode support in Windows seems vague on
how Unicode is implemented. A good deal of it seems to imply that a character
is always represented by exactly two bytes, no more, no less, under all
6 matches
Mail list logo
