Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants

2004-09-01 Thread klists
Hello All, What is the preferred terminology in the Unicode context: "glyph variants" or "glyphic variants"? Both exist in real-life documents. Thanks in advance for any views on this! Best regards, Marc Küster

Unicode V4 and ISO

2004-09-01 Thread Martine Brunet
Hello, I am new on this list and I have a question about very special characters and the standard Unicode v4. I sought much the answer to this question at  www.unicode.org but without success. Can somebody say to me if the characters of the 4 following standards ISO 5426 -2:1996, ISO 6861:1996, I

Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants

2004-09-01 Thread Marion Gunn
The expression 'glyph variants' would be more common, I believe. mg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello All, > > What is the preferred terminology in the Unicode context: "glyph > variants" or "glyphic variants"? Both exist in real-life documents. > > Thanks in advance for any views on this! >

Re: Unicode V4 and ISO

2004-09-01 Thread Patrick Andries
Martine Brunet a écrit : Hello, I am new on this list and I have a question about very special characters and the standard Unicode v4. I sought much the answer to this question at  www.unicode.org but without success. Can somebody say to me if the characters of the 4 following standard