Re: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Doug Ewell
Jrg Knappen knappen at uni dash mainz dot de wrote: I see a precedent in Unicode to treat Copyright-like sign differently from simple encircled letters: Unicode takes precautions not to encode the same character twice. Therefore, superscript digits 2 and 3 are absent from the superscript

Re: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
On 2004.09.19, 21:37, Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any precedent in Unicode for saying, of a symbol or character known to some user community, that it should be encoded using some combination involving U+20DD? I don't mean a formal Technical Report or anything, just a

Named sequences, was: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Peter Kirk
On 20/09/2004 19:21, Asmus Freytag wrote: ... PS for named sequences: See: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr34 Draft Data: http://www.unicode.org/Public/4.1-Update/NamedCompositeEntities-4.1.0d4.txt (the last part of the file name may change to NamedSequences*.txt). The draft data is actually

RE: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Jörg Knappen
Michael Everson schrieb: At 13:07 -0700 2004-09-20, Kenneth Whistler wrote: ARABIC HAH COPYRIGHT SIGN * used in Saudi Arabia or even: CIRCLED ARABIC LETTER HAH * a copyright sign used in Saudi Arabia Both naming suggestions are fine with me. An aside: The arabic word for right

Re: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 10:55 PM 9/20/2004, Doug Ewell wrote: Jörg Knappen knappen at uni dash mainz dot de wrote: I see a precedent in Unicode to treat Copyright-like sign differently from simple encircled letters: Unicode takes precautions not to encode the same character twice. Therefore, superscript digits 2

Re: Named sequences, was: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 03:58 AM 9/21/2004, Peter Kirk wrote: On 20/09/2004 19:21, Asmus Freytag wrote: ... PS for named sequences: See: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr34 Draft Data: http://www.unicode.org/Public/4.1-Update/NamedCompositeEntities-4.1.0d4.txt (the last part of the file name may change to

RE: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Kent Karlsson
Kenneth Whistler wrote: Second, there is the question of cursive joining for Arabic. I don't know anything in the Unicode Standard that states that a combining enclosing mark breaks cursive ligation. It stands to reason that it *should*, but I don't know anything that requires it. Well,

RE: Saudi-Arabian Copyright sign

2004-09-21 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Kent wrote: Kenneth Whistler wrote: Second, there is the question of cursive joining for Arabic. I don't know anything in the Unicode Standard that states that a combining enclosing mark breaks cursive ligation. It stands to reason that it *should*, but I don't know anything that