Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Unicode defines only 4 *standard* normalization forms (NFC, NFD,
NFKC, NFKD), but other *non-standard* normalization forms are
possible:
But should not be used. It can be tricky enough getting the four
standard ones right as it is.
Dear friends, colleagues, everybody,
W3C has opened a position in Internationalization at Keio University
in Japan, because I'm leaving the W3C Team at the end of March.
For details, please see http://www.w3.org/2004/12/i18nposition.
For other open positions at W3C, please see
Title: RE: Is it roundtripping or transfer-encoding
Philippe Verdy wrote:
Please don't use the term normalize in this context.
Normalization in
Unicode involves transformation of the stream of *code
points*, but is
independant of their encoding form or encoding scheme.
Yes, I
I have some good news to report:
The National Endowment for the Humanities has just approved funding for the
Universal Scripts Project, which is a continuation of the Script Encoding
Initiative started two years ago at UC Berkeley. This funding provides a solid
beginning for work on Unicode
Dear Friends,
Please remember that job postings of any kind are absolutely
forbidden on the Unicode mail list. The posting that referred
to Keio University has been removed from the archives.
For further information about mail list policies, please see
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Wrong. Non-standard normalization forms are useful too, and can even
be safe if they preserve one of the two standard equivalences
(canonical or compatibility).
I agree that non-standard normalization
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Unicode defines only 4 *standard* normalization forms (NFC, NFD, NFKC,
NFKD), but other *non-standard* normalization forms are possible:
But should not be used. It can be tricky enough getting the four
On 22/12/2004 07:07, Doug Ewell wrote:
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Unicode defines only 4 *standard* normalization forms (NFC, NFD, NFKC,
NFKD), but other *non-standard* normalization forms are possible:
But should not be used. It can be tricky enough
The CLDR Technical Committee has posted a new issue for public
review and comment. Details are on the following web page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/#pri58
Review periods for the new items close on January 31, 2005.
Please see the page for links to discussion and relevant documents.
9 matches
Mail list logo
