U NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 5202 (20100616) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
I'd love to see that in Javascript. Of course then you need to know if it will
shape correctly as well for it to be useful to the end user. Dotted circles
are only marginally better than square boxes. And that's a much harder
question to answer...
-Original Message-
From: unicode-bou
04 NA NA NA NA NA
__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 5202 (20100616) __
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
It would be really nice if there were a way to just query the darned
rendering engine as to whether it can render character U+ at all, as
opposed to displaying a .notdef glyph. Anything beyond that would be a
bonus.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645
> John -> If I define a symbol (variable or constant) named ɸ and some
> user types 'Ï' or 'Ï' instead, it won't match.
>
> Can you please post the names for the other two, i.e., 'Ï' or 'Ï' ?
John was referring to:
U+0278 LATIN SMALL LETTER PHI
U+03C6 GREEK SMALL LETTER PHI
U+03D5 GREEK P
John -> If I define a symbol (variable or constant) named ɸ and some
user types 'φ' or 'ϕ' instead, it won't match.
Can you please post the names for the other two, i.e., 'φ' or 'ϕ' ?
John -> That's why we have Latin-1, Latin-2, etc.
It looks like Latin-1 Latin-2 etc are sub sets of Latin, prob
Hi, Marc,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Marc Durdin
wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Couldn't you do this just using font fallback in CSS, and just leave it to
> the user agent to sort out? Two examples:
>
> P { font-family: Code2000, MyCode2000; }
> �...@font-face { font-family: MyCode2000; src: url('code
I would have thought that putting your font last in the css list would be
enough, so it only uses it if the other fonts don't have the needed character.
> But now that “good” browsers support @font-face, we can envision a
> better solution: If the browser does not have a font for rendering a
> s
Most BaseSymbols show fill1 and rotation 1. Handshapes are the
exception. There are 261 different handshapes broken into 10 groups.
The first handshape in each group uses fill 1 and rotation 1. The rest
of the handshapes use fill 2. This is a standard that has been used
since the beginning
Stephen,
why does the base character in the second example have a different "default"
fill?
Even if that would happen to be the most common version, I think you should
have a consistent base-fill and fill modifiers which does not depend on an
implied base fill.
/Szabolcs
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at
10 matches
Mail list logo
