Thank you for your reply.
On Wednesday 4 August 2010, Karl Pentzlin wrote:
> WO> Why is it not possible specifically to request a one-storey form of
> lowercase letter a?
>
> I did not this, as I do not know a cultural context where the two-storey form
> is to be suppressed to prevent an "a
On Wednesday 4 August 2010, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> However, there's no need to add variation sequences to
> select an *ambiguous* form. Those sequences should be
> removed from the proposal.
Are you here talking about such things as alternate glyph styles?
It depends what one means by "need"
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 Karl Pentzlin wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. August 2010 um 19:11 schrieb Janusz S. BieÅ:
>
> JJSB> I see no reason why, if I understand correctly, the long s variant is
> JSB> to be limited to Fraktur-like styles.
>
> The *variant* is applicable to situations where the character i
On 8/5/2010 3:47 AM, William_J_G Overington wrote:
On Wednesday 4 August 2010, Asmus Freytag wrote:
However, there's no need to add variation sequences to
select an *ambiguous* form. Those sequences should be
removed from the proposal.
Are you here talking about such things as alter
> I am thinking of where a poet might specify an ending version
> of a glyph at the end of the last word on some lines, yet not
> on others, for poetic effect. I think that it would be good
> if one could specify that in plain text.
Why can't a poet find a poetic means of doing that, instead o
Kent Karlsson wrote:
I see absolutely no point in reencoding the digits 0-9 even though 9
is (strangely) used to denote the value that is usually denoted 10.
That is just a (very strange) usage, not different characters from
the ordinary 0-9.
I suggested encoding all of them because U+0030
6 matches
Mail list logo
