Thank you for replying.
On Friday 6 August 2010, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
What you mean are artistic or stylistic variants.
These have certain problems, see here for an explanation:
http://www.unicode.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=221#p221
A./
I have read and
Thank you for replying.
On Friday 6 August 2010, John H. Jenkins jenk...@apple.com wrote:
This is another case of a solution in search of a problem.
No, the problem is that one cannot at present, as far as I know, access
alternate glyphs of an advanced format font from a plain text file.
Am 2010-08-07 04:19, schrieb Murray Sargent:
In general to type in a character by its Unicode value,
type in the hex value and then alt+x.
In some MS programs, e. g. the German version of MS Word,
it’s rather Alt-C, as Alt-X is endowed with some other meaning.
Best wishes,
Otto Stolz
William_J_G Overington wjgo underscore 10009 at btinternet dot com
wrote:
I cannot understand from that text, or otherwise at the time of
writing this reply, why it would not be possible to have an alternate
ending glyph for a letter e accessible from plain text using an
advanced font
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Kenneth Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote:
What I now would like to know is what became of the UTC tentative
preference for option #2, and where this is documented,
Unicode 5.2, Chapter 3:
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.2.0/ch03.pdf
pp. 94 - 95,
Michael Everson
On 6 Aug 2010, at 22:20, Karl Pentzlin wrote:
Am Dienstag, 3. August 2010 um 09:45 schrieb Michael Everson:
ME ... In particular the implications
ME for Serbian orthography would be most unwelcome.
As I have outlined in the revised introduction of my proposal,
verdy_p verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
I am not convinced too. Because all what this proposal is supposed to
solve is to allow an automted change of orthography so that SOME long
s in old doucments using Fraktur style will become round s in some
other antermediate style (like
7 matches
Mail list logo
