RE: ,,semi-virgula''

2010-08-31 Thread Peter Constable
If this needed a distinct encoding, then I'd be inclined to encode the letter-diacritic combinations as atomic characters because they form a single outline, and the interaction of the diacritic with the letter depends on the particular letter. This is similar to encoding of letters with retrofl

Re: ,,semi-virgula''

2010-08-31 Thread Otto Stolz
Hello, Am 2010-08-31 16:57, schrieb Janusz S. Bień: Can the diacritic be interpreted as an already exisiting combining character? Perhaps: 0326 Combining comma below 0329 Combining vertical line below 0337 Combining short solidus overlay Cheers, Otto Stolz

Re: ,,semi-virgula''

2010-08-31 Thread Leonardo Boiko
2010/8/31 Janusz S. Bień : > First, is "semivirgula" a good name? Google shows that it often refers > to semicolon. I’m no specialist and I have no idea about what’s the original name of that diacritic, but “virgula” is the name of the comma in medieval manuscripts[1]. To this day it’s the word f

Re: U-Source ideographs mapped to themselves

2010-08-31 Thread Uriah Eisenstein
Thanks for the answers (and sorry for the somewhat late reply), My interest in this question is purely technical - as I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm trying to load Unihan data into an SQL database*, so occasionally I need more details about the contents of fields without actually using them. In this