From: Asmus Freytag [mailto:asm...@ix.netcom.com]
> IPA has other characteristics in both its usage and its encoding that you
> need to consider to make the comparison valid.
> First, IPA requires specialized fonts because it relies on glyphic
> distinctions
> that fonts not designed for IPA
On 11/18/2010 11:15 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
If you'd like a precedent, here's one:
Yes, I think discussion of precedents is important - it leads to the
formulation of encoding principles that can then (hopefully) result in
more consistency in future encoding efforts.
Let me add the cavea
2 matches
Mail list logo
