Re: Are Latin and Cyrillic essentially the same script?

2010-11-23 Thread Michael Everson
On 22 Nov 2010, at 18:55, Asmus Freytag wrote: > That seems to be true for IPA as well - because already, if you use the font > binding for IPA, your a's and g's will not come out right, which means you > don't even have to worry about betas and chis. Not so. There is already a convention (goi

Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro

2010-11-23 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 11/23/2010 1:58 AM, sowmya satyanarayana wrote: This what I am actually looking for. My ODBC application supports UTF-16, which is 2 byte width characters. This application is completely oriented around using _T(x) macro as Asmus Freytag figured out. Yeah, it's nice when you can do witho

Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro

2010-11-23 Thread sowmya satyanarayana
>>> Asmus Freytag wrote > TCHAR x = _T('x'); > TCHAR * x = _T("x"); > > that is to wrap a string or character literal so that it can be used either > as >Unicode literal or as non-Unicode literal, depending on whether some global >compile time flat (usually UNICODE or _UNICODE) is set or > > n