----- Original Message ----- From: Shriramana Sharma <samj...@gmail.com> To: Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri <bbcisi...@gmail.com> Cc: pan...@umich.edu, unic...@unicode.org, Unicode Discussion List <unicode@unicode.org> Sent: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:07:46 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: Placement of Bengali Candrabindu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri <bbcisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I did not get why you have written 'so called "Bengali" script' but did not > not add 'so called' to Assamese / Kampuri / AMBM / Pub Nagari / Eastern > Nagari scripts. Kindly enlighten. Shriramana Sharma wrote: >Dear sir, >It was just a joke. No offence intended. >Have you not seen the recent postings on this list asserting >that the >Bengali script encoded in Unicode should not be called >Bengali but one >of those other names? -- >Shriramana Sharma Mr. Sharma might have realised his unintentional offence against the advocates for naming the script as "BENGALI"( by calling it a joke) but probably did not realise till now what offence he did with his next couple of lines) to those trying and asserting the the concerned script be named as ASSAMESE or atleast ASSAMESE/BENGALI and consequent modifications. Thefore reluctantly but intentionally I am tempted to call the present naming of the script and letters as BENGALI as 'Joke' Hope Unicode will be serious correcting the joke. Regards
