Re: [indic] Malayalam 'repha'

2011-10-23 Thread Shriramana Sharma
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:29 AM, John Hudson wrote: > However, other Malayalam fonts that I have looked at do not implement the > repha in this way, but instead represent conjunct-initial Ra with a full > form glyph. I would like to confirm whether this is the norm for the > reformed orthography,

Re: Need for Level Direction Mark

2011-10-23 Thread CE Whitehead
Hi. From: Peter Edberg Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:22:33 -0700 > In the PRI 205 forum - http://www.unicode.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=33 - I > have posted a draft summary of feedback on Level > Direction Mark received to date originally on the PRI 205 page > (http://www.unicode.org/review/pri

Re: MODIFIER LETTER ___ H WITH STROKE

2011-10-23 Thread Petr Tomasek
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:30:36AM +0300, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > 17.10.2011 12:12, philip chastney wrote: > > >the SIL PUA > >(http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=PUA_home) > >is slowly being absorbed into TUS > > Private Use Areas are for what the name says, private us