Re: Hittite cuneiform

2011-12-17 Thread Michael Everson
On 17 Dec 2011, at 16:49, Raymond Mercier wrote: > I agree that the Hittite signs are a relatively small subset of those used in > Sumerian, Akkadian, etc., but the values so often differ that it seems to me > that a separate listing of the Hittite usage is appropriate. The value of "c" is [k]

Re: Hittite cuneiform

2011-12-17 Thread Raymond Mercier
From: "Michael Everson" > Hittite cuneiform is a subset of http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U12000.pdf I agree that the Hittite signs are a relatively small subset of those used in Sumerian, Akkadian, etc., but the values so often differ that it seems to me that a separate listing of the Hit

Re: Hittite cuneiform

2011-12-17 Thread Michael Everson
On 17 Dec 2011, at 11:41, Raymond Mercier wrote: > Why has Hittite cuneiform not yet been included ? Hittite cuneiform is a subset of http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U12000.pdf Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

Hittite cuneiform

2011-12-17 Thread Raymond Mercier
Why has Hittite cuneiform not yet been included ? As one sees from the table in http://www.ancientscripts.com/hittite.html, it should be easy enough, just as Old Persian and Ugaritic are included under the general heading Cuneiform. Best wishes Raymond Mercier