On 17 Dec 2011, at 16:49, Raymond Mercier wrote:
> I agree that the Hittite signs are a relatively small subset of those used in
> Sumerian, Akkadian, etc., but the values so often differ that it seems to me
> that a separate listing of the Hittite usage is appropriate.
The value of "c" is [k]
From: "Michael Everson"
> Hittite cuneiform is a subset of http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U12000.pdf
I agree that the Hittite signs are a relatively small subset of those used in
Sumerian, Akkadian, etc., but the values so often differ that it seems to me
that a separate listing of the Hit
On 17 Dec 2011, at 11:41, Raymond Mercier wrote:
> Why has Hittite cuneiform not yet been included ?
Hittite cuneiform is a subset of http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U12000.pdf
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Why has Hittite cuneiform not yet been included ? As one sees from the table in
http://www.ancientscripts.com/hittite.html,
it should be easy enough, just as Old Persian and Ugaritic are included under
the general heading Cuneiform.
Best wishes
Raymond Mercier
4 matches
Mail list logo