Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
I would to stick with GPL, doing all the changes on someone's whim is too big hassle for me, and can be confusing for recipients. Remember, that I have private life, so changing things on someone's whim, while not really necessary, too much wastes my private life time. James Kass --- On Fri,

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

2012-02-04 Thread Szelp, A. Sz.
James, you might want to review (at least) the OFL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIL_Open_Font_License, a license specifically created for fonts, created with freedoms in mind. In several respects it fits fonts much better than GPLv3. /Sz On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 18:12, James Kass

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

2012-02-04 Thread Szelp, A. Sz.
Sorry, I was reading my mail threads according to time/date. I see now that the same has been proposed on the other thread. I also see you preferring not to act due to private commitments and time constrains. Sorry, again, for bringing this up unnecessarily. All the best for your struggle, and

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
Open Font License added already to https://sourceforge.net/projects/code2000/ page. So Code2nnn is now dual-licensed. James Kass --- On Sat, 2/4/12, Szelp, A. Sz. a.sz.sz...@gmail.com wrote: From: Szelp, A. Sz. a.sz.sz...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
As a side effect of correspondence with Thierry Thomas and Paul Wise I provide evidence of third party non-trustable Wikipedia rumouring abuse against myself and others to avoid any misunderstanding. James Kass PS: Evidence for following facts: 1 - instead of doing paid research, Lukas Pietsch

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

2012-02-04 Thread Shriramana Sharma
Sorry I don't understand, what is this in aid of? Sent from my Android phone On Feb 4, 2012 5:52 PM, James Kass jamesk...@att.net wrote: As a side effect of correspondence with Thierry Thomas and Paul Wise I provide evidence of third party non-trustable Wikipedia rumouring abuse against

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
Sadly, I am insulted, nazified and reviled by this german Lukas Pietsch, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Code2000 And the same happens to your fellow Indians from the same Lukas Pietsch hands:

Over 60% of the web

2012-02-04 Thread Mark Davis ☕
There's an posting with an updated graph of the percentage of the web in Unicode, for those interested: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/unicode-over-60-percent-of-web.html Mark

Current repeated hacking attempts against my jamesk...@att.net account

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
I *repeatedly* receive illicit emails which want me to reveal my login and password. They are proof that I am still not hacked since early 2000s and I never will be hacked, simply because I never provide my login and password to anyone, to avoid hijacking. Below are *TWO* examples of such

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Michael Everson
On 3 Feb 2012, at 21:52, James Kass wrote: My English deteriorated so much over the last couple of years, simply because my mind became simpler, without excessive bells and whistles, it was side effect of my simply focusing on current living cheaply, due to worldwide ravaging economical

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
I am as physical worker talking much with immigrants, mexicans, gringos, etc... you know. So I could catch some talking habits from them. I perform manual labor to stay afloat when worldwide financial crisis is ravaging. James Kass --- On Sat, 2/4/12, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com wrote:

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Michael Everson
On 4 Feb 2012, at 19:43, James Kass wrote: I am as physical worker talking much with immigrants, mexicans, gringos, etc... you know. So I could catch some talking habits from them. I perform manual labor to stay afloat when worldwide financial crisis is ravaging. I cannot believe that this

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
I don't care if someone believes me or not. I'm getting sick from these whole speculations about me. I simply must be afloat, or bailiff will bid off me in the opposite case for failing to paying taxes. James Kass --- On Sat, 2/4/12, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com wrote: From: Michael

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Michael Everson
On 4 Feb 2012, at 20:00, James Kass wrote: I don't care if someone recte 'anyone' believes me or not. I'm getting sick from recte 'of' these whole recte 'all these' speculations about me. I simply must be afloat, Up a creek is more like it. or bailiff recte 'or the bailiff' will

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
Abuse? What a utter nonsense. If someone wants to contact me later in case of my forced disappearance, let's he will use the following forum: http://linuxfr.org/users/thth/journaux/code2000-usurpation-ou-liberation-que-fait-la-police , where links to my Code2nnn fonts are also stored. James

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Julian Bradfield
FWIW, the messages from James Kass are being posted from an ADSL broadband service in Poland. -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread James Kass
._.___ |__|_|__|_|__/ |__|__\\\__/\|__|/_//\_/|_ |___Y__\/\\__\___|\_//_/_/_|_ |___|__(__/\___|__\\__|_ _\/_\/_\/_\/\/_\/_ 7\-\3 |\-\|20Z3/V (|23\/\/

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Doug Ewell
Well, that's a disappointment. I was hoping the real James had surfaced, even if he can't work on the fonts any more. That means a whole lot of digital ink just got wasted arguing over the perfect license. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell Sent via

Code2000 troll

2012-02-04 Thread Mark Leisher
I just caught up with the conversation. I think James has been hacked; the att.net and sourceforge accounts clearly had the same password. None of the recent messages to this list purporting to be from him are even remotely in James' style. Has anyone attempted to get Sourceforge to lock the

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Mark Leisher
On 02/04/2012 12:43 PM, James Kass wrote: I am as physical worker talking much with immigrants, mexicans, gringos, etc... you know. So I could catch some talking habits from them. I perform manual labor to stay afloat when worldwide financial crisis is ravaging. I reported the abuse to

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Rick McGowan
And, the most recent mysterious development: unsubscription requests have come in from that James Kass account for all of the mail lists that it just subscribed to a few days ago. It obviously wasn't the real guy. Posting from that address has now been disabled on the Unicode list... Rick

Old Hungarian

2012-02-04 Thread Doug Ewell
Today I was alerted: N4222 http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n4222.pdf Response to the N4917 about the Rovas Script And so here we go again, yet another salvo in the ongoing battle over the correct English-language name of the script, over how many such scripts there actually

Recent Proposals

2012-02-04 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 2/4/2012 2:55 PM, Doug Ewell wrote: And so here we go again, yet another. Doug, for something completely different, check out the Unicode Forum http://unicode.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21t=254 where you'll find an open the link to an interesting set of characters being proposed.

Re: Old Hungarian

2012-02-04 Thread Joó Ádám
Frankly, it's very disappointing to see the encoding of this fascinating and historic writing system be delayed for so many years due to this kind of squabbling. Doug, I, as a user of Old Hungarian have started a discussion on the possible encoding of the script which eventually lead here,

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Philippe Verdy
Someone using jamesk...@att.net wrote (from Poland) : Abuse? What a utter nonsense. If someone wants to contact me later in case of my forced disappearance, I'm not a native English speaker, but clearly this does not seem to be a correct English language for me. let's he will use Here

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread Philippe Verdy
All this looks like the email address is now controled by someone else that abuses an identity and reputation, and performs copyright infringement. I'm not in Poland, but in my country, if copyright infringement is just a civil case, an identity fraud is criminal. I suggest we report the

Re: Old Hungarian

2012-02-04 Thread Doug Ewell
No, I'm not at all sure of that. I'm also probably less disappointed than Michael, who wrote the first draft proposal for Old Hungarian (N1686) more than fourteen years ago. But now it's disappointing to us outsiders as well. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org |

Re: Code2000 on SourceForge

2012-02-04 Thread john knightley
Yesterday I contacted the person claiming to be James Kass the maker of the Code2000 series of fonts. The person using the account clearly is not James Kass the maker of the font. When asked questions he restricts himself to answers that can be found by a google search and when asked further