On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Escape Landsome wrote:
> In Arabic, when writing a LAM followed by an ALIF, you have a special
> ligature of the two letters
Some (broken) fonts do not form the lam-alif ligature when you insert
some non-spacing mark between lam and alif:
http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-
2012/3/26 Escape Landsome :
> Hello
>
> I'm not quite sure this has something to do with Unicode (rather than
> HTML, for instance), but I keep asking the question :
>
> In Arabic, when writing a LAM followed by an ALIF, you have a special
> ligature of the two letters
>
> On the arab sites I consu
Hello
I'm not quite sure this has something to do with Unicode (rather than
HTML, for instance), but I keep asking the question :
In Arabic, when writing a LAM followed by an ALIF, you have a special
ligature of the two letters
On the arab sites I consult, I see that : لَا
The problem is by n
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Steven Atreju wrote:
> Denis Jacquerye wrote [2012-03-26 13:35+0200]:
>> The fact [.] doesn't make it any saner.
>>
>> The same could be said [.]
>>
>> Denis Moyogo Jacquerye
>
> Are you trying to say that extra tables and exact additional
> knowledge besides Unico
Denis Jacquerye wrote [2012-03-26 13:35+0200]:
> The fact [.] doesn't make it any saner.
>
> The same could be said [.]
>
> Denis Moyogo Jacquerye
Are you trying to say that extra tables and exact additional
knowledge besides UnicodeData.txt should not be necessary?
In the end you wanna make it a
So far the linguistic atlases I have seen extensively use this
combining letter mechanism, with diacritics changing the meaning of
the combining letter or of the base letter.
There are a whole lot of notations that could simply be base combining
letter + combining diacritics, but if you consider t
6 matches
Mail list logo
