Kent,
No, 20D7 is not a Diacritic, it is Other_Math, therefore the dot should remain.
In general, mathematical combining characters are not diacritics.
Renderers that treat "combining" as a synonym for "diacritic" and
remove the dot are in error.
UAX 44 says, "Characters that linguistically modif
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Kent Karlsson wrote:
> Not sure why you include "k" here (which has no dot any which way)...
Just a little hint because my question might look too strange.
i, j, k with arrow are used in mathematics and physics
to denote the vectors (1,0,0) , (0,1,0) and (0,0,1) .
Sometimes I
Den 2012-08-01 19:41, skrev "Andreas Prilop" :
> Is it correct that
>
> U+0069 U+20D7
> U+006A U+20D7
>
> should have a dot
No, they are soft-dotted:
0069..006A; Soft_Dotted # L& [2] LATIN SMALL LETTER I..LATIN SMALL
LETTER J
which means that the inherent dot should be removed if a d
Is it correct that
U+0069 U+20D7
U+006A U+20D7
should have a dot and that
U+0131 U+20D7
U+0237 U+20D7
U+006B U+20D7
should have no dot?
4 matches
Mail list logo