Re: Small i with/out dot and with arrow

2012-08-01 Thread Leo Broukhis
Kent, No, 20D7 is not a Diacritic, it is Other_Math, therefore the dot should remain. In general, mathematical combining characters are not diacritics. Renderers that treat "combining" as a synonym for "diacritic" and remove the dot are in error. UAX 44 says, "Characters that linguistically modif

Re: Small i with/out dot and with arrow

2012-08-01 Thread Andreas Prilop
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Kent Karlsson wrote: > Not sure why you include "k" here (which has no dot any which way)... Just a little hint because my question might look too strange. i, j, k with arrow are used in mathematics and physics to denote the vectors (1,0,0) , (0,1,0) and (0,0,1) . Sometimes I

Re: Small i with/out dot and with arrow

2012-08-01 Thread Kent Karlsson
Den 2012-08-01 19:41, skrev "Andreas Prilop" : > Is it correct that > >   U+0069 U+20D7 >   U+006A U+20D7 > > should have a dot No, they are soft-dotted: 0069..006A; Soft_Dotted # L& [2] LATIN SMALL LETTER I..LATIN SMALL LETTER J which means that the inherent dot should be removed if a d

Small i with/out dot and with arrow

2012-08-01 Thread Andreas Prilop
Is it correct that   U+0069 U+20D7   U+006A U+20D7 should have a dot and that   U+0131 U+20D7   U+0237 U+20D7   U+006B U+20D7 should have no dot?