Re: Mayan numerals

2012-08-26 Thread Richard Wordingham
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:30:49 +0100 Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com wrote: On 23 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Jameson Quinn wrote: • We will have guessed wrong on the metadata, and the decision is made that a retroactive fix is the best solution, given that it (say) impacts only documents

Re: Mayan numerals

2012-08-26 Thread Michael Everson
On 27 Aug 2012, at 00:21, Richard Wordingham wrote: We do where the properties necessitate, e.g. U+0241 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER GLOTTAL STOP and U+0294 LATIN LETTER GLOTTAL STOP, Those are not duplicate characters. There is a case-pairing glottal stop and a non-casing glottal stop. That is a

Re: Mayan numerals

2012-08-26 Thread Asmus Freytag
I see simple continuation of pre-judging and speculation here. The proper thing is to wait for a proposal to come in, look at the evidence presented, and then, and only then, decide whether there are functional and/or usage differences that require or suggest certain encoding actions. A./

Re: Mayan numerals

2012-08-26 Thread Richard Wordingham
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:46:12 +0100 Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com wrote: On 27 Aug 2012, at 00:21, Richard Wordingham wrote: We do where the properties necessitate, e.g. U+0241 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER GLOTTAL STOP and U+0294 LATIN LETTER GLOTTAL STOP, Those are not duplicate