Re: New Canonical Decompositions to Non-Starters

2013-02-17 Thread Philippe Verdy
2013/2/17 Richard Wordingham : > No. I am trying to confirm that there will never be any character but > U+0344, U+0F73, U+0F75 and U+0F81 that has a non-singleton canonical > decomposition to non-starters. The only way I see can for that to > happen is a decomposition via one of U+0F73, U+0F75 a

Re: New Canonical Decompositions to Non-Starters

2013-02-17 Thread Richard Wordingham
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:12:26 -0800 Asmus Freytag wrote: > On 2/17/2013 8:20 AM, Richard Wordingham wrote: > > Is there any guarantee that U+E4567 will not have a > > canonical decomposition mapping to > U+E4568>? If so, where is it published? I thought we had guarantees > > that new canonical d

Re: German »ß«

2013-02-17 Thread Neil Harris
On 17/02/13 10:48, Philippe Verdy wrote: I was not citing empirical results but things that are regulated by legislation. And your existing empirical results are just nfomal tests ignoring important parts of the population of drivers, notably: - those driving by night : the effet of some visual d

Re: New Canonical Decompositions to Non-Starters

2013-02-17 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 2/17/2013 8:20 AM, Richard Wordingham wrote: Is there any guarantee that U+E4567 will not have a canonical decomposition mapping to ? If so, where is it published? I thought we had guarantees that new canonical decompositions to non-starters would not be created (to in this case), but I cann

New Canonical Decompositions to Non-Starters

2013-02-17 Thread Richard Wordingham
Is there any guarantee that U+E4567 will not have a canonical decomposition mapping to ? If so, where is it published? I thought we had guarantees that new canonical decompositions to non-starters would not be created (to in this case), but I cannot find it. This conceivable decomposition mappin

Re: German »ß«

2013-02-17 Thread Julian Bradfield
On 2013-02-17, Philippe Verdy wrote: > I was not citing empirical results but things that are regulated by > legislation. No you weren't - you were making explicit claims that lowercase is harder to read than capitals. You said nothing about regulation. > And your existing empirical results are

Re: Word reversal from Abobe to Word

2013-02-17 Thread Raymond Mercier
Thanks to all for your comments on the problem of copying a Hebrew phrase from Adobe to Word. The Hebrew phrase is מהלך חמה הבינוני בשנים מחוברות ופרוטות וחדשים I have had another look at the problem, with these results. Copy from Adobe Acrobat 6 (with Select text): Paste into Word as rtf -

Re: German »ß«

2013-02-17 Thread Dominikus Dittes Scherkl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 17.02.2013 05:40, schrieb Asmus Freytag: > For Germany, look at > http://www.ace-online.de/fileadmin/user_uploads/Der_Club/Presse-Archiv/Bilder/Verkehr/Autobahn/Autobahn_01.jpg Too bad that this picture is not a few pixels wider, else you would see

Re: German »ß«

2013-02-17 Thread Philippe Verdy
I was not citing empirical results but things that are regulated by legislation. And your existing empirical results are just nfomal tests ignoring important parts of the population of drivers, notably: - those driving by night : the effet of some visual defects like asygmatism, which is only parti

Re: s-j combination in Unicode?

2013-02-17 Thread Richard Wordingham
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:08:24 -0800 Asmus Freytag wrote: > On 2/16/2013 7:04 AM, Andries Brouwer wrote: >> I found Diauni.ttf at >> http://www.thesauruslex.com/typo/dialekt.htm (swedish) >> http://www.thesauruslex.com/typo/engdial.htm (english) >> It has landmålsalfabetet at E100-E197 (lower c

Re: s-j combination in Unicode?

2013-02-17 Thread Stephan Stiller
I think it's a waste of everybody's time to even contemplate forcing "fallback" transformations (which are a pain to program) when perfectly straightforward capital form can be deduced, and has been deduced (at least by font creators - we don't know what user requests they based their work on

Re: German »ß«

2013-02-17 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 2/16/2013 11:19 PM, Julian Bradfield wrote: On 2013-02-17, Philippe Verdy wrote: True lowercase letters are causing problems on road sign indicators on roads with high speed : they are hard to read and if the driver has to look at them for one more second, he does not look at the road. AS I

Re: s-j combination in Unicode?

2013-02-17 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 2/17/2013 12:30 AM, Stephan Stiller wrote: But I have to ask one more thing: Since the latter is expected to be rare, I personally would be comfortable with making a code point for it, so that fonts like this, which are actually used, can be mapped to Unicode w/o forcing people into weird

Re: s-j combination in Unicode?

2013-02-17 Thread Stephan Stiller
As far as real ambiguities are introduced, the loss of capitalization on the first letter introduces far more, impressionistically speaking, and they might be legally subtle Though, to partially correct myself, /this/ is an issue for English, but not really for German. But I have to ask one