I'm looking for freely downloadable TTF fonts for any of the following.
I'd appreciate links to sites for any of these:
1. Bassa_Vah
2. Duployan
3. Grantha
4. Khojki
5. Khudawadi
6. Mahajani
7. Mende_Kikakui
8. Modi
9. Mro
10. Nabataean
11. Old_Permic
12.
Am 22.10.2014 um 09:27 schrieb Mark Davis ☕️:
Bassa_Vah
Duployan
Grantha
Khojki
Khudawadi
Mahajani
Mende_Kikakui
Modi
Mro
Nabataean
Old_Permic
Palmyrene
Pau_Cin_Hau
Tirhuta
Warang_Citi
You’re asking for quite a lot – for nothing.
best,
Andreas Stötzner.
(font
On 22 October 2014 08:27, Mark Davis ☕️ m...@macchiato.com wrote:
I'm looking for freely downloadable TTF fonts for any of the following. I'd
appreciate links to sites for any of these:
Bassa_Vah
Duployan
Grantha
Khojki
Khudawadi
Mahajani
Mende_Kikakui
Modi
Mro
Nabataean
Old_Permic
ScriptSource has links to fonts, and you may find some there. For
instance, I immediately found three Bassa_Vah fonts, two of which appear
to be free, one of which costs only $19.
There's also a freeware font for Grantha.
I didn't search further.
(Fwiw, you can find the right ScriptSource
The Grantha link is broken. The site no longer exists. I have
contacted the original author. Will post here once he replies.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
Dear Andrew,
Most of the scripts listed below did come via Script Encoding Initiative (SEI),
you are correct.
The intent of SEI was to work on proposals and provide fonts but, to date, the
focus of the work has been almost exclusively on getting scripts into Unicode
and not on the creation of
Hi,
I have 2 questions related to the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm,
both regarding limits on certain aspects of the UBA.
First, I'd like to ask about the 127 entries of the directional status
stack; it had 63 entries in the version of the UBA before Unicode 6.3.
Where and why are such deep
From: Andrew Glass (WINDOWS) andrew.gl...@microsoft.com
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:57:52 +
Thanks for responding.
Embeddings are common in generated text. The guiding principle, is seemingly,
when in doubt wrap the string in an embedding. At the UTC, we heard, that
this can lead to
Eli,
Embeddings are common in generated text. The guiding principle, is
seemingly, when in doubt wrap the string in an embedding. At the UTC, we
heard, that this can lead to very deep stacks - but I've never actually seen
one with more than 63 levels - but that is not my topic here.
I'd
Debbie,
Thanks for the explanation. I just wonder, in order to get a script
accepted for encoding the proposer has to provide a font for the
Unicode/10646 code charts, so creating a font (that is at least good
enough for the code charts even if it does not have full shaping
behaviour) is an
Eli,
I think you are correct that the BidiCharacterTest.txt data currently
does not go beyond 3 nesting levels for testing the BPA part of UBA.
I agree with Andrew that that is reasonable guide to the normal limit
of meaningful bracket embeddings one might find in text. However,
I don't think it
Dear Andrew,
It is true that proposals require a font to create the code charts, but I was
careful in my comments to say SEI doesn't currently fund creation of
distributable fonts.
Fonts for proposals are usually very basic, and often partly auto-generated by
font editing software, usually
On 10/22/2014 12:29 PM, Andrew West wrote:
should not the font be made freely available at the end of
the project?
The policy requires that a license is given to produce the charts and
related documents. No more, no less. This allows people and
organizations to donate a free license for use
From: Whistler, Ken ken.whist...@sap.com
CC: unicode@unicode.org unicode@unicode.org, Whistler, Ken
ken.whist...@sap.com
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:18:38 +
Accept-Language: en-US
I'd appreciate some pointers to such texts, if they are publicly
accessible. I'd be very
14 matches
Mail list logo
