Den 2015-02-02 19:36, skrev Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com:
Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as
U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these
I think you mean 33 % taller, i.e. height 133 % relative to its normal
On 2 Feb 2015, at 23:31, Kent Karlsson kent.karlsso...@telia.com wrote:
Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as
U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these
I think you mean 33 % taller, i.e. height 133 % relative to its
For what it's worth, the N'ko Institute of America uses U+2019. But that is
probably a reflection of the font situation and the fact that U+2019 is often
more accessible in word processors.
http://nkoinstitute.com/the-n-character/
-Original Message-
From: Unicode
On 31 Jan 2015, at 22:04, Markus Scherer markus@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Unicoders, which is the proper second character in N'Ko?
See below for details.
U+2019. It is not a letter in N’Ko. Moreover, the reference fonts for N’Ko
didn’t even have U+02BC.
For N’Ko, this is not arguable.
I
The link did not pass :
http://nkoinstitute.com/nko-alphabet/
2015-02-02 19:54 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr:
On this page
the N'ko Institute hesitates ans uses U+2018 (‘) in English i.e. the
reverse direction.
It has advantages that it is used immediately after letter N/n
On this page
the N'ko Institute hesitates ans uses U+2018 (‘) in English i.e. the
reverse direction.
It has advantages that it is used immediately after letter N/n and if ever
it appears at end of words, it won't match a pair of single quotation marks
(U+2018 is a punctuation only at start of
6 matches
Mail list logo
