RE: Tag characters

2015-05-21 Thread Peter Constable
Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service? P From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag (t) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 10:15 PM To: Eric Muller; unicode@unicode.org Subject: Re: Tag characters On 5/20/2015 9:57 PM, Eric Mu

Re: Tag characters

2015-05-21 Thread Philippe Verdy
2015-05-21 4:11 GMT+02:00 Doug Ewell : > Philippe Verdy wrote: > > URLs were initially deisgned to be stable (and this is still a strong >> recommendation). >> > [+ 559 words] > > It doesn't matter if they were designed to be stable. Users don't keep > them stable. > > I can't believe we're debat

Re: simplified Chinese words （土+从）

2015-05-21 Thread Andrew West
Hi Shi Zhao, The character 土+从 is not yet in Unicode, but it is scheduled for inclusion in CJK Extension F. You can see the character here (http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14271-n4637.pdf on p. 148), but you should not rely on the code point which will surely change. Andrew On 21 May 2015 at

RE: Tag characters

2015-05-21 Thread Erkki I Kolehmainen
I don’t think so. Sincerely, Erkki Lähettäjä: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] Puolesta Peter Constable Lähetetty: 21. toukokuuta 2015 18:46 Vastaanottaja: Asmus Freytag (t); Eric Muller; unicode@unicode.org Aihe: RE: Tag characters Would Unicode really want to get into the

Re: Tag characters

2015-05-21 Thread Asmus Freytag (t)
On 5/21/2015 8:46 AM, Peter Constable wrote: Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service? I suspect both Eric and I may have have been slightly tongue-in-cheek with respect to UFLs... ... not sure about anybody else. Cheers, A./ P *From:*Unicode [mail