Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service?
P
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
(t)
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 10:15 PM
To: Eric Muller; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Tag characters
On 5/20/2015 9:57 PM, Eric Mu
2015-05-21 4:11 GMT+02:00 Doug Ewell :
> Philippe Verdy wrote:
>
> URLs were initially deisgned to be stable (and this is still a strong
>> recommendation).
>>
> [+ 559 words]
>
> It doesn't matter if they were designed to be stable. Users don't keep
> them stable.
>
> I can't believe we're debat
Hi Shi Zhao,
The character 土+从 is not yet in Unicode, but it is scheduled for
inclusion in CJK Extension F. You can see the character here
(http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14271-n4637.pdf on p. 148), but you
should not rely on the code point which will surely change.
Andrew
On 21 May 2015 at
I don’t think so.
Sincerely, Erkki
Lähettäjä: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] Puolesta Peter Constable
Lähetetty: 21. toukokuuta 2015 18:46
Vastaanottaja: Asmus Freytag (t); Eric Muller; unicode@unicode.org
Aihe: RE: Tag characters
Would Unicode really want to get into the
On 5/21/2015 8:46 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL
service?
I suspect both Eric and I may have have been slightly tongue-in-cheek
with respect to UFLs...
... not sure about anybody else.
Cheers,
A./
P
*From:*Unicode [mail
5 matches
Mail list logo