As explained in TUS 7.0, §6.2 (General Punctuation), p. 273, U+2044
FRACTION SLASH is intended for use with Basic Latin digits, or other
digits with General Category = Nd. The superscript and subscript
presentation forms have General Category = No.
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton,
I'm not sure if this is a joke or not:
http://deadline.com/2015/07/emoji-movie-sony-pictures-animation-anthony-leondis-kung-fu-panda-secrets-of-the-masters-1201482768/
Garth Wallace gwalla at gmail dot com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a joke or not:
Yes.
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:46 David Starner [mailto:prosfil...@gmail.com] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:14 AM Dreiheller, Albrecht
albrecht.dreihel...@siemens.com wrote:
If the author really intends to deceive potential readers he will succeed.
Possibly. Code is hard. But the Ogham space is
On 7/21/2015 2:55 PM, Dreiheller,
Albrecht wrote:
Of course, there are
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM Dreiheller, Albrecht
albrecht.dreihel...@siemens.com wrote:
My concern is not about the Ogham space, but about the free usage of
non-Ascii in programming languages in general.
Just imagine, when you decide to open a door for public traffic in busy
city with a
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:10:14 +0800
gfb hjjhjh c933...@gmail.com wrote:
When you write text in modern Chinese, there will not be any break
between different words, and thus if you segment characters according
to the ideographic characters, what being groupped together would
either be a clausee
Entering fractions in plain text is consistent with the very core of Unicodeʼs
purpose, which (please check if Iʼm right) is to empower all people on earth to
get in readable plain text as much information as possible. As fractions, that
ISO wanted to stay called “vulgar”, are part of this
When you write text in modern Chinese, there will not be any break between
different words, and thus if you segment characters according to the
ideographic characters, what being groupped together would either be a
clausee or a sentence, Or even a whole paragraph if you are handling some
older
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:14 AM Dreiheller, Albrecht
albrecht.dreihel...@siemens.com wrote:
If the author really intends to deceive potential readers he will succeed.
Possibly. Code is hard. But the Ogham space is not a real threat; it's easy
to search for and obviously a deliberate attempt
On 13 Jul 2015, at 11:28, I wrote:
The only time I saw UTF-8 like on the T-shirt, was when opening UTF-8 files
that didn't specify charset=UTF-8. The thing to do was to add the charset in
the file header.
Now I see that this issue is much more tricky. I've just stumbled over a
no-display
Allowing arbitrary non-Ascii characters in programming languages will make it
more difficult
to detect malicious code.
If the author really intends to deceive potential readers he will succeed.
Programming languages like JS should at least implement exclusion rules from
the Unicode Confusables
I'm puzzled by a statement in UAX #29 Unicode Text Segmentation:
In particular, the characters with the Line_Break property values of
Contingent_Break (CB), Complex_Context (SA/Southeast Asian), and
Unknown (XX) are assigned word boundary property values based on
criteria outside of the scope of
The IBM page seems to have an ellipsis character in UTF-8, with bytes E2 80 A6.
The web server is set to force all browsers to use the encoding iso-8859-1
regardless of what charset is stipulated in the html code. The browser uses
the Win 1252 equivalents and displays …
To see what a web
14 matches
Mail list logo
