On Saturday, 8 August 2015, Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Michael did do a series of blog posts on building TSF based input methods
years ago. Something I tinkered with off and on.
What we're waiting for is a guide we can follow, or some code we can
ape. Such
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:05:26 +1000
Andrew Cunningham lang.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 8 August 2015, Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Michael did do a series of blog posts on building TSF based input
methods years ago. Something I tinkered with off and on.
On 08 Aug 2015, at 00:18, Doug Ewell wrote:
Marcel Schneider wrote:
I just donʼt want to let the Mailing List believe that I agreed being
classified as «fighting the [bad] fight»
And I don't think Michael implied that. I just want to get the technical
facts, so that hopefully they can
I think about another bug in my mailbox, so that this mail I sent in Plain
Text on Thu, 6 Aug 2015, landed all wrecked in the Archive.
Please may I resend this for that behalf.
(I already ended up replacing all and by single angle quotation marks.)
If you are a Mailing List subscriber,
On 08 Aug 2015, at 02:19, Andrew Glass (WINDOWS) wrote:
Sorry to be late to this thread. I'm the Program Manager responsible for
MSKLC at this time. As far as the history here, I can only reiterate
Michael's point that making significant changes to user32.dll faces
significant, perhaps
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
Marcel Schneider charupd...@orange.fr wrote:
2. Supposed that Windows supported more than four characters per
ligature:
2.1. Why has the MSKLC been limited to four characters per
ligature?
Because that was believed to be the architectural limit.
On 08 Aug 2015, at 00:30, Doug Ewell wrote:
Marcel Schneider wrote:
I brought the good news that SIXTEEN UNICODE CODE POINTS can be
generated by a single key stroke on Windows six dot one. The only bad
news, because of which I've e-mailed to the List, is that that wasn't
working in
On 08 Aug 2015, at 15:01, Richard Wordingham wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
Marcel Schneider wrote:
2. Supposed that Windows supported more than four characters per
ligature:
2.1. Why has the MSKLC been limited to four characters per
ligature?
Because that was
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marcel Schneider charupd...@orange.fr
I'm very puzzled about this being UTF-16 code units, as stated also in the
MSKLC Help. In the driver source kbd*.c, each of those entities is
referred
to as WCHAR, which is meant to mean (^^)
On 08 Aug 2015, at 16;39, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
The Windows WCHAR is a 16-bit data type. What Windows documentation
calls Unicode characters are Unicode codepoints encoded in UTF-16.
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Marcel Schneider
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
Marcel Schneider charupd...@orange.fr wrote:
Further, we're awaiting the responses from Mr Glass at Microsoft.
See http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2015-August/002465.html .
More information would take time.
Richard.
Now that I know Andrew is the PM for MSKLC ¹, and can answer Marcel's
questions (publicly or privately) with authority, I'll duck out of this
thread.
¹ I'm glad to hear that there is such a person. I was afraid the project
had been left to die.
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton,
On 8/8/2015 6:26 AM, Marcel Schneider
wrote:
a useless worsening of the usability and of the usefulness of a product.
Quote of the day.
A./
Richard Wordingham richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:05:26 +1000
Andrew Cunningham lang.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael did do a series of blog posts on building TSF based input
methods years ago. Something I tinkered with off and on.
Does this mean that one
On 08 Aug 2015, at 19;45, Doug Ewell wrote:
Now that I know Andrew is the PM for MSKLC ¹,
Probably Mr Glass wasn't Mr Kaplan's boss, so he is to overtake a legacy
without having been involved in its generating. I didn't well notice the
chronological relationship, so I asked questions whose
On 8/8/2015 1:57 PM, Marcel Schneider
wrote:
Now that I know Andrew is the PM for
MSKLC ¹,
Probably Mr Glass wasn't Mr Kaplan's boss, so he is to
overtake a legacy without having been involved in its
generating. I didn't well notice
16 matches
Mail list logo
