Touché! 😑
Thanks,
Niki
Excuse my spelling, this is sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 18, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Shawn Steele wrote:
>
> I'm sure Klingons love them!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Mark E.
> Shoulson
> Sent: Tuesday, Augu
I'm sure Klingons love them!
-Original Message-
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Mark E. Shoulson
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 5:53 PM
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: a suggestion new emoji .
On 08/18/2015 07:20 PM, Emma Haneys wrote:
> hello dear uni
On 08/18/2015 07:20 PM, Emma Haneys wrote:
hello dear unicode , i just wondering if i can suggest a new emoji .
hoppefully you can respone to me . i suggest one and only for fruit
category . it is a durian . thanx
Ah, durians. Kind of a cross between food and weaponry.
~mark
hello dear unicode , i just wondering if i can suggest a new emoji .
hoppefully you can respone to me . i suggest one and only for fruit
category . it is a durian . thanx
On 8/18/2015 9:45 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
Ken Whistler wrote:
Then we're back to the central point that Alex Weiner originally
expressed, in arguing for the encoding of precomposed letters with
underbar:
The string length functionality would view an 'A' code point combined
with an '_' code p
Ken Whistler wrote:
>> A more
>> robust approach for their purposes might be to teach ρ to exclude
>> combining characters (gc=Mn) when counting the "size" of a string.
>
> And it seems to me that that is *very* unlikely to happen, precisely
> because ρ is so deeply embedded in the array and vect
On 8/18/2015 9:23 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
Tom Gewecke wrote:
I guess the question is whether having a named sequence would somehow
make it easier for the gnu apl folks to add something to their system
so that their string length function sees such a sequence as having a
length of "1"?
I don't
Ken Whistler wrote:
> Returning to a historical note on the glyphic forms and the question
> of combining low lines or combining macrons below... admittedly a
> side note on this thread, the *original* identification of these APL
> uppercase Latin letters, at least in their IBM implementations, w
Tom Gewecke wrote:
> I guess the question is whether having a named sequence would somehow
> make it easier for the gnu apl folks to add something to their system
> so that their string length function sees such a sequence as having a
> length of "1"?
I don't see why that would, or should, be th
Returning to a historical note on the glyphic forms and the question
of combining low lines or combining macrons below... admittedly a
side note on this thread, the *original* identification of these APL
uppercase Latin letters, at least in their IBM implementations, was
clearly as uppercase (ital
On Aug 18, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> It is NOT necessary for a combining sequence to be assigned a name,
> either by the Unicode Technical Committee or by anyone else, in order to
> use it. Note that of the two sequences:
>
> A̱ <0041, 0331>
> A̲ <0041, 0332>
>
> neither sequenc
On 8/18/2015 6:18 AM,
alexwei...@alexweiner.com wrote:
"PUA"?
Private use area.
A./
PS: "underbar" is Swedish for "wonderful". Go figure.
Original Message
Subject: RE: APL Under-bar Characters
From: "Erk
wrote:
> Since it seems that all hope of adding characters is lost, I think the
> next best goal would be to try an reach some sort of semblance between
> the Unicode Consortium and a nebulous group of people (APLers) who
> really believe that the uppercase under-bar letters are atomic and
> diff
ah yes. I believe the "private use area" was also suggested and may provide a
route to take
-Alex
Original Message
Subject: Re: APL Under-bar Characters
From: Leo Broukhis
Date: Aug 18, 2015 10:38 AM
To: alexwei...@alexweiner.com
CC: e...@iki.fi,charupd...@orange.fr,"unicode U
http://www.acronymfinder.com/Information-Technology/PUA.html
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:18 PM, wrote:
> "PUA"?
>
> Original Message
> Subject: RE: APL Under-bar Characters
> From: "Erkki I Kolehmainen"
> Date: Aug 18, 2015 6:55 AM
> To: "'Marcel Schneider'" ,"'Unicode Mailing L
"PUA"?
Original Message
Subject: RE: APL Under-bar Characters
From: "Erkki I Kolehmainen"
Date: Aug 18, 2015 6:55 AM
To: "'Marcel Schneider'" ,"'Unicode Mailing List'"
CC: alexwei...@alexweiner.com
Mr. Schneider
Free Software Movement or not makes no difference. Furthermo
Mr. Schneider
Free Software Movement or not makes no difference. Furthermore, please consult
the membership roster of Unicode before making statements on what Unicode is a
consortium of.
You also state:
If underbar letters are for the sole use of GNU APL, their implementation and
font s
On 18 Aug 2015 at 10:09, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> it helps if hou reduce the processor frequency (if you don't have a tool fir
> that, use the energy control panel and set the power profile to max energy
> saving) just before clicking the button to build the package.
That's a very good idea. I'
it helps if hou reduce the processor frequency (if you don't have a tool
fir that, use the energy control panel and set the power profile to max
energy saving) just before clicking the button to build the package.
i don't know why these c source files need to be deleted so fast when they
could jus
On 18 Aug 2015 at 06:56, David Starner
wrote:
> There are many languages, particularly Native American languages, given
> written form in the typewriter era that use letters with under-bar as part of
> their alphabet. And the underbar is no different from the cedilla, the acute
> and grave acc
20 matches
Mail list logo
