Re: Dark beer emoji

Marcel Schneider wrote as follows: > Given all the colours to be encoded as a modifier, could there be a way to > encode a MULTICOLOUR EMOJI MODIFIER? It could consist of two hex digits for > the code range, and three hex digits for the colour (based on the HTML three > digit hex codes for

Upcoming proposal for Bitcoin sign

I'm putting together a proposal for the Bitcoin sign to be added to Unicode, so I wanted to check here if people have any comments/concerns/objections. I'm aware of the previous rejected proposal L2/11-130 and I address the issues from its

Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

Hello, Since I implement parts of the Unicode standard I'm interested in keeping in touch with discussions about the standard and its evolution from a technical point of view. I'm however not interested in the encoding point of view and all the discussions of whichever pet symbol or concept

RE: Dark beer emoji

If we have a bunch of ingredients emoji, then do yeast + grain + hops emoji combine into beer emoji?

Re: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:41:39 -0700, Doug Ewell wrote: > > Daniel Bünzli wrote: > > > Since I implement parts of the Unicode standard I'm interested in > > keeping in touch with discussions about the standard and its evolution > > from a technical point of view. > > > > I'm however not

Re: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

On Sep 3, 2015 5:11 PM, "Daniel Bünzli" wrote: > > Hello, > > Since I implement parts of the Unicode standard I'm interested in keeping in > touch with discussions about the standard and its evolution from a technical > point of view. > > I'm however not interested

RE: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

Daniel Bünzli wrote: >> For 75 USD per year, or about 73 CHF, you can join the Unicode >> Consortium as an individual member, and thereby have full access to >> the Unicore list and other internal technical discussion lists. > > Well that sounds elitist... FWIW, I'm not a member due to the

Re: Dark beer emoji

On 9/3/2015 9:15 AM, Shawn Steele wrote: If we have a bunch of ingredients emoji, then do yeast + grain + hops emoji combine into beer emoji?   Only if you add heat, time and water

Re: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

Le jeudi, 3 septembre 2015 à 18:33, Doug Ewell a écrit : > For 75 USD per year, or about 73 CHF, you can join the Unicode > Consortium as an individual member, and thereby have full access to the > Unicore list and other internal technical discussion lists. Well that sounds elitist... Joke

Re: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

Daniel Bünzli wrote: > Since I implement parts of the Unicode standard I'm interested in > keeping in touch with discussions about the standard and its evolution > from a technical point of view. > > I'm however not interested in the encoding point of view and all the > discussions of whichever

Re: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

Le jeudi, 3 septembre 2015 à 17:41, Doug Ewell a écrit : > Well, that's not elitist or anything. > > Many of us are also implementers of the Unicode Standard, have been on > the Unicode list for a long time (17 years in my case), and hardly think > of ourselves as "random people from the

RE: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

For 75 USD per year, or about 73 CHF, you can join the Unicode Consortium as an individual member, and thereby have full access to the Unicore list and other internal technical discussion lists. There are discounts on membership rates if you pay for 3 or more years at a time.

Re: Technical or encoding sub mailing list ?

Daniel Bünzli wrote: Since I implement parts of the Unicode standard I'm interested in keeping in touch with discussions about the standard and its evolution from a technical point of view. I'm however not interested in the encoding point of view and

Decomposition/Compatibility Mapping Issue

So ... I was looking at http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/regex.jsp?a=%5Cp%7Bscript%3DHan%7D=? and getting a cool looking Modified Regex Pattern. The last range ??-?? is CJK Compatibility Ideographs Supplement U+2F800-2FA1D. [?-??-??--??-??-??-??-??-???-----??]

Re: Dark beer emoji

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:00:25 -0700, Garth Wallace wrote: > > With U+1F35E BREAD it will be particularly useful to denote completeness. > > Whole bread vs white bread -- and all crumb tone levels between. > > TYPE 1-2: White bread > TYPE 3: Potato bread > TYPE 4: Whole wheat > TYPE 5: Multigrain

Re: Dark beer emoji

On 9/3/2015 2:09 AM, Marcel Schneider wrote: Asmus already told us that there'll be no soy beans emoji, by lack of iconicity. However, could there be a generic BEANS emoji A coffee bean has a very recognizable shape, and I personally would

Re: Dark beer emoji

On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:26:07 -0700, Doug Ewell wrote: > Garth Wallace wrote: > > > TYPE 1-2: White bread > > TYPE 3: Potato bread > > TYPE 4: Whole wheat > > TYPE 5: Multigrain > > TYPE 6: Pumpernickel > > While trying to construct a rejoinder involving soft drinks (variously > "soda" or

Re: Dark beer emoji

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 02:45:26 -0700, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote: > On 9/3/2015 2:09 AM, Marcel Schneider wrote: > > Asmus already told us that there'll be no soy beans emoji, by lack of > > iconicity. However, could there be a generic BEANS emoji > A coffee bean has a very recognizable shape, and