I was having an offline discussion with someone regarding certain topics that
may show up on this list on occasion, and the question came up of what evidence
we might have of sentiment on the list. So, I thought I'd conduct a simple
straw poll - respond if you feel inclined.
The questions are f
Q1: neutral
Q2: annoying
Q3: reducing value of the list for me
Le jeu. 10 sept. 2015 20:10, Peter Constable a
écrit :
> I was having an offline discussion with someone regarding certain topics
> that may show up on this list on occasion, and the question came up of what
> evidence we might have
On 9/10/2015 11:04 AM, Peter Constable
wrote:
I was having an offline discussion with
someone regarding certain topics that may show up on this list
on occasion, and the question came up of what evidence we
Q1 I ignore threads that aren’t of interest (outlook even has a handy “ignore
thread” button - though lists like this tend to break it)
Q2 If they get too annoying and don’t have useful content, then I make a rule
to send that person’s mail to the trashcan. I include their name in the body to
ca
Asmus, this came out of a friendly conversation meant to understand what kinds
of topics do or don’t seem interesting to people, and how people might react.
There was real interest in getting some indication of list sentiment. I
certainly don’t mean to cause offense, or get too off topic. But I
Dear Peter,
This is the sort of inquiry that would be more efficiently conducted as a poll
independent of the listserv, say with Google forms, to get a broader, more
representative response from list members, many of whom wish neither to post
nor to read individual responses on the listserv.
j
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:04:33 +
Peter Constable wrote:
> The questions are framed around this hypothetical scenario: Suppose I
> were to post a message to the list describing some experiment I did,
> creating a Web page containing (say) some Latin characters - not
> obscure, just-added-in-Unic
7 matches
Mail list logo