is the term "exponentially" really appropriate ? the NamesList file is not
so large, and the grow would remain linear.
Anyway, this file (current CSV format or XML format) does not need to be
part of the core UCD files, they can be in a separate download for people
needing it.
One benefit I would
U+23FF is already assigned to OBSERVER EYE SYMBOL, which is
already under ballot for 10646 (and approved by the UTC).
http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html
Please always first check that page before suggesting code points
for prospective new characters.
--Ken
On 3/12/2016 5:42 PM, Marcel
On 3/13/2016 12:03 PM, Doug Ewell wrote:
My point is that of J.S. Choi and Janusz Bień: the problem with
declaring NamesList off-limits is that it does contain information
that is either:
• not available in any other UCD file, or
• available, but only in comments (like the MAS mappings), whic
Ken Whistler wrote:
> The trick is this: the status of annotational data in NamesList.txt
> is different than that of normative data like the code points, names,
> formal name aliases, decomposition mappings, and standardized
> variation sequences.
I get that. I am FAR more comfortable with that
Quote/Cytat - Doug Ewell (pon, 14 mar 2016, 19:22:14):
Ken Whistler wrote:
The trick is this: the status of annotational data in NamesList.txt
is different than that of normative data like the code points, names,
formal name aliases, decomposition mappings, and standardized
variation sequence
Janusz S. Bień wrote:
>> • don't ask for additions or changes
>
> What about reporting possible mistakes?
I'd assume that egregious, demonstrable errors, such as misspelled
character names or incorrect individual code points, could be reported,
and anything beyond that probably should not.
--
On 3/14/2016 11:33 AM, Janusz S. Bien wrote:
Quote/Cytat - Doug Ewell (pon, 14 mar 2016, 19:22:14):
Ken Whistler wrote:
The trick is this: the status of annotational data in NamesList.txt
is different than that of normative data like the code points, names,
formal name aliases, decomposition
On 3/14/2016 11:22 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
Ken Whistler wrote:
The trick is this: the status of annotational data in NamesList.txt
is different than that of normative data like the code points, names,
formal name aliases, decomposition mappings, and standardized
variation sequences.
I get that.
8 matches
Mail list logo