Variations and Unifications ?

As part of my investigations into astrological symbols, I'm beginning to wonder if glyph variations are justifications for separate encoding of symbols I would have previously considered the same or unifiable with symbols already in Unicode. For example, the semisquare aspect is usually shown

Re: Purpose of and rationale behind Go Markers U+2686 to U+2689

I have received a response from Barbara Beeton, along with an approval to post it here. I have redacted the intro and outro where she admits it's "certainly not a real answer", but IMO it's still useful for documentation. Response from Barbara Beeton: (Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:49:14 -0400) On

Re: Purpose of and rationale behind Go Markers U+2686 to U+2689

On 15 March 2016 at 19:48, K.C.Saff wrote: > > I often see numbers roll over at 100, displayed on a new board, so even just > the full set of two digit forms adds a lot of utility for go games. This > seems to be a standard practice at Wikipedia ( >

Re: annotations

On 3/15/2016 7:42 AM, Doug Ewell wrote: Asmus Freytag wrote: • don't ask for additions or changes Additions and changes to annotations are considered all the time. Well, yes. I meant additions and changes to