On 2016/03/31 06:42, Philippe Verdy wrote:
The use of "ÿ" in Dutch should also be considered as an orthographic fault,
and it should be corrected into "ij" (to solve the capitalization problem),
but there are occurences in Dutch of "ÿ" which is correct (notably in
borrowed French toponyms such as
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:42:20 +0200, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Note that the single letter "ij" in Dutch is often undistinctable from "ÿ",
> which is also commonly found as a convenient substitute in many old documents
> not encoded with Unicode but with ISO8859-1 : this has a caveat because the
>
On 03/30/2016 11:54 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Jennifer 8. Lee mailto:je...@jennifer8lee.com>> wrote:
I thought his "elf exposing self in park" was an amazing (and
accurate) facial expression.
Right! How does he make his cheeks do that!?!
Botox?
Note that the single letter "ij" in Dutch is often undistinctable from "ÿ",
which is also commonly found as a convenient substitute in many old
documents not encoded with Unicode but with ISO8859-1 : this has a caveat
because the capitalization would produce "Y" (in ISO8859-1), possibly
followed by
In my opinion, the Dutch IJ/ij "ligature" is not really a ligature and should
be treated exactly like Æ/æ or Œ/œ as a plain single letter.
The use of IJ/ij (encoded as separate letters) is a actually an
orthographic fault, that a ligature will not help resolve.
Thanks, the decomposition of the "IJ"
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:14:59 +0100, Kent Karlsson wrote [in the thread “Re:
Swapcase for Titlecase characters”]:
[…]
> I still think ij should have the "soft-dotted" property (and that
> that property is finally implemented properly in various systems...).
[Refers to:
Re: Case for letters j and
2016-03-30 20:24 GMT+02:00 Doug Ewell :
> > Fredrik passed this on:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfZE56E0Uts ; skip ahead to 1:30.
>
> This is great! Now all of America knows what Unicode is really all
> about.
>
All of America really? Do they all look at the same TV show on the same
chann
> Fredrik passed this on:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfZE56E0Uts ; skip ahead to 1:30.
This is great! Now all of America knows what Unicode is really all
about.
🤨
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
He has suggestions for process improvements as well…
From: Unicore [mailto:unicore-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Jennifer 8. Lee
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 10:37 AM
To: Mark Davis ☕️
Cc: UTC ; Unicode Public
Subject: Re: UTC makes the Colbert show
He cites you by title!
On Wednesday,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Jennifer 8. Lee
wrote:
> I thought his "elf exposing self in park" was an amazing (and accurate)
> facial expression.
>
Right! How does he make his cheeks do that!?!
Mark
Quote/Cytat - Andrew West (Tue 29 Mar 2016
06:15:15 PM CEST):
On 29 March 2016 at 16:19, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> All documents submitted to WG2 and to L2 by individuals are copyright
> of the author(s) of the document. Documents do not need to carry a
> copyright notice to have copyright,
Fredrik passed this on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfZE56E0Uts ; skip ahead to 1:30.
Mark
12 matches
Mail list logo