RE: UAX29 9.0.0 Grapheme cluster spec & test discrepancy

2016-06-21 Thread Laurentiu Iancu
Hello, This discrepancy was addressed during the release process. Please refer to the published Version 9.0 of UAX #29 and the UCD files. Regards, L. -Original Message- From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Bünzli Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:2

RE: UAX 29 9.0.0 new emoji flag rules questions and comments

2016-06-21 Thread Laurentiu Iancu
Hello, Re #1, the ^ symbol indeed denotes a start-of-line anchor, in usual regex notation, and the corresponding rules could use sot instead. Re #2, that was an oversight, and will be addressed in the Proposed Update of UAX #29 for Unicode 10.0. Re #3 and #4, both were addressed before t

UAX29 9.0.0 Grapheme cluster spec & test discrepancy

2016-06-21 Thread Daniel Bünzli
Hello, It seems there's a discrepancy between the tests and the spec for grapheme clusters. In http://www.unicode.org/Public/9.0.0/ucd/auxiliary/GraphemeBreakTest.txt we have: ÷ 261D × 0308 × 1F3FB ÷ # ÷ [0.2] WHITE UP POINTING INDEX (E_Base) # × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS (Extend) #

UAX 29 9.0.0 new emoji flag rules questions and comments

2016-06-21 Thread Daniel Bünzli
I have a few questions/comments about the new emoji segmentation rules in 9.0.0 1. I have trouble understanding what the ^ symbol means in these rules: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/proposed.html#GB8a http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/proposed.html#WB15 does it correspond to the regexp

Re: Release date?

2016-06-21 Thread Karl Williamson
On 06/21/2016 08:43 AM, Doug Ewell wrote: http://opiniojuris.org/2016/06/20/emojis-and-international-law "And tomorrow, June 21, we will have 71 new emojis to play with." Do only bloggers and the press get notified in advance of the release date of Unicode 9.0? http://www.unicode.org/versions

RE: Release date?

2016-06-21 Thread Doug Ewell
Ken Whistler wrote: >> Do only bloggers and the press get notified in advance of the release >> date of Unicode 9.0? > > They are getting it from the same place all of the members and anybody > else could have been seeing it, the draft 9.0.0 landing page we've had > up for months as part of the be

The license for Unihan v1.1

2016-06-21 Thread Jun Aruga
Hello, I would like to ask you about the license of the old version Unicode mapping data v1.1. I am developing for Ruby package. And there are files in the Ruby package with Unihan GB12345-90 (GB12345-80), GB2312-80 Unicode version 1.1. [1][2] I would like to ask which license should be used fo

Re: Release date?

2016-06-21 Thread Ken Whistler
Doug, On 6/21/2016 7:43 AM, Doug Ewell wrote: "And tomorrow, June 21, we will have 71 new emojis to play with." Do only bloggers and the press get notified in advance of the release date of Unicode 9.0? They are getting it from the same place all of the members and anybody else could have be

Release date?

2016-06-21 Thread Doug Ewell
http://opiniojuris.org/2016/06/20/emojis-and-international-law "And tomorrow, June 21, we will have 71 new emojis to play with." Do only bloggers and the press get notified in advance of the release date of Unicode 9.0? -- Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸