Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

Now if he had used an emoji that shows the mode of the text it would have been a lot more obvious, but we already established that the world does not need emoji. Regards, Khaled On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:31:10AM +0100, Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote: > Sorry, but such English subtle interpreta

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

2018-02-21 15:51 GMT+01:00 Khaled Hosny : > Now if he had used an emoji that shows the mode of the text it would > have been a lot more obvious, but we already established that the world > does not need emoji. > No, I don't need emojis. Any emoji means all or nothing, they are just unnecessary an

Suggestions?

Where can I post suggestions and feedback for Unicode?

Re: Suggestions?

On 2/21/2018 7:23 AM, Jeb Eldridge via Unicode wrote:     Where can I post suggestions and feedback for Unicode?     What kinds of suggestions / what kind of feedback are

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

On 2/21/2018 7:28 AM, Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote: 2018-02-21 15:51 GMT+01:00 Khaled Hosny : Now if he had used an emoji that shows the mode of the text it would

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

2018-02-21 18:10 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode : > Feeling a bit curmudgeony, are we, today? :-) > Don't know what it means, never heard that word, not found in dictionaries. Probably a local US jargon or typo in your strange word.

Re: Suggestions?

The Unicode website has a section for feedback in its menu, but in separate projects for TUS and for CLDR. There are also feedbacks requested for every proposed amendment to the standard, annexes, and data. First search the relevant topic on the website, then look at the side bar if there's no spec

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

“Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English word attested back to 1590. -- > On Feb 21, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Philippe Verdy via Unicode > wrote: > > 2018-02-21 18:10 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode : >> Feeling a bit curmudgeony, are we, today? :-) > Don't know what it means, never heard that

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

On 2/21/2018 9:23 AM, Philippe Verdy wrote: 2018-02-21 18:10 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode mailto:unicode@unicode.org>>: Feeling a bit curmudgeony, are we, today? :-) Don't know what it means, never heard that word, not found in dictionaries. Probably alocalUS jargon or typo in your

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > “Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English word attested back to 1590. > Curmudgeony may be identified as misspelled by Google, but it's got a bit of usage dating back a hundred years. Wiktionary's entry at

Re: Suggestions?

http://www.unicode.org/faq/faq_on_faqs.html#34

Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:28:14 +0100 Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote: > I even hope that there will be a setting in all browsers, OS'es, > mobiles, and apps to refuse any colorful rendering, and just render > them as monochromatic symbols. In summary, COMPLETETY DISABLE the > colorful extensions o

Re: Suggestions?

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:55 AM Jeb Eldridge via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > Where can I post suggestions and feedback for Unicode? > Here is as good as any place. There are specific places for a few specific things, but likely if you do have something that's likely to get changed, yo

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

Philippe Verdy: > > I even hope that there will be a setting in all browsers, OS'es, mobiles, > and apps to refuse any colorful rendering, and just render them as > monochromatic symbols. In summary, COMPLETETY DISABLE the colorful > extensions of OpenType made for them. See

Re: Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)

I'm not speaking about hieroglyphs, even if they are perfectly readable in monochrome on monuments. I was just saying that colorful **emojis** are just a nuisance and colors in them do not add any semantic value (except possibly flags, skin tones were added only to avoid a never-ending battle on e

Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

On 2/21/2018 11:45 AM, David Starner via Unicode wrote: On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy via Unicode wrote: “Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English

Re: Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:04:34 +0100 Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote: > On the opposite, colored in Arabic or hieroglyph texts is a a useful > emphasize and sometimes semantically significant (some rare old > scripts also used dictinctive colors): we are in a case similar to > encoded semantic var

Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls

On 2018/02/17 08:25, James Kass via Unicode wrote: Some people studying Han characters use the IDCs to illustrate the ideographs and their components for various purposes. Well, as far as I understand, this was their original (and is still their main) purpose. For example: U-0002A8B8 𪢸 ⿰土