Re: Missing UAX#31 tests?

2018-07-08 Thread Karl Williamson via Unicode
On 07/08/2018 03:23 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote: PS, although the title was "Missing UAX#31 tests?", I assumed you were talking about http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/ Yes, sorry.

Re: Missing UAX#31 tests?

2018-07-08 Thread Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
PS, although the title was "Missing UAX#31 tests?", I assumed you were talking about http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/ Mark On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote: > I'm surprised that the tests for 11.0 passed for a 10.0 implementation, > because the following should have triggere

Re: Missing UAX#31 tests?

2018-07-08 Thread Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
I'm surprised that the tests for 11.0 passed for a 10.0 implementation, because the following should have triggered a difference for WB. Can you check on this particular case? ÷ 0020 × 0020 ÷ # ÷ [0.2] SPACE (WSegSpace) × [3.4] SPACE (WSegSpace) ÷ [0.3] About the testing: The tests are generate