Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph

2019-09-27 Thread Ken Whistler via Unicode
Fred, 2 hours and 33 minutes from now (today). But you don't need to try to synch a proposal like this to a particular script ad hoc meeting. That group meets roughly once a month, and any new proposal coming in right now wouldn't be on the Unicode 13.0 train, even if the UTC immediately agre

Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph

2019-09-27 Thread Yifán Wáng via Unicode
> * Does the existence of the legacy Adobe encoding Adobe-Japan1-6 shift the > balance? It has a SQUARE TB at CID+8306. The code point suggests that it was already there as early as Adobe-Japan1-1 in 1993. The fact makes it seem certainly weird why it hasn't been included like its fellows nearby.

Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph

2019-09-27 Thread Julian Bradfield via Unicode
On 2019-09-27, David Starner via Unicode wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 8:57 PM Fred Brennan via Unicode > wrote: [snip] >> There is no sequence of glyphs that could be logically mapped, unless you're >> telling me to request that the sequence T B be recommended for general >> interchange as SQ