Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara

2020-01-02 Thread Richard Wordingham via Unicode
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:07:04 -0800 Norbert Lindenberg wrote: >> On Jan 2, 2020, at 12:20, Richard Wordingham via Unicode >> wrote: >> So, the problem should already be solved for Grantha, and, >> if the plans come to fruition, will work with a font whose >> Devanagari script tag is 'dev3'.

Re: Long standing problem with Vedic tone markers and post-base visarga/anusvara

2020-01-02 Thread Richard Wordingham via Unicode
On Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:52:55 + James Kass via Unicode wrote: > > I've been looking at Microsoft's specification of Devanagari > > character order.  In > > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/script-development/devanagari, > > the consonant syllable ends > > > > [N]+[A] + [<

Re: Call for feedback on UTS #18: Unicode Regular Expressions

2020-01-02 Thread Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
The line just above that is: Name matching rules follow Matching Rules from [UAX44#UAX44-LM2 ]. The deletion was based on feedback that the deleted text was a recap of the above line, but a

Re: Call for feedback on UTS #18: Unicode Regular Expressions

2020-01-02 Thread Karl Williamson via Unicode
One thing I noticed in reviewing this is the removal of text about loose matching of the name property. But I didn't see an explanation for this removal. Please point me to the explanation, or tell me what it is. Specifically these lines were removed: As with other property values, names